146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29804486)
41. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mackeen AD; Sullivan MV; Schuster M; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel.
Tzimas V; Kotsias C; Galanis C; Panagiotakopoulos G; Tsiampas D; Parnis J; Tilkeridis K; Fiska A
Scars Burn Heal; 2022; 8():20595131221128951. PubMed ID: 36200049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: comparison of two types of single-layer suture.
Ceci O; Cantatore C; Scioscia M; Nardelli C; Ravi M; Vimercati A; Bettocchi S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 22612785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effect of skin coverage method following subcuticular suturing on wound infection rates at cesarean delivery
Westcott JM; Crockett L; Qiu F; Berg TG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(16):2003-2005. PubMed ID: 27624413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Barbed vs conventional suture at cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Agarwal S; D'Souza R; Ryu M; Maxwell C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jun; 100(6):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 33404082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Skin closure at cesarean section, polypropylene versus polyglactin 910: a randomized controlled study.
Koroglu N; Temel Yuksel I; Aslan Cetin B; Aytufan Z; Deniz N; Akca A; Yetkin Yildirim G; Yuksel A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Mar; 35(6):1088-1092. PubMed ID: 32228099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Continuous versus disrupted subcutaneous tissue closure in cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.
Lauterbach R; Ben David C; Bachar G; Justman N; Matanes E; Ginsberg Y; Vitner D; Beloosesky R; Weiner Z; Zipori Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jan; 160(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 35766992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Randomized clinical trial of skin closure by subcuticular suture or skin stapling after elective colorectal cancer surgery.
Kobayashi S; Ito M; Yamamoto S; Kinugasa Y; Kotake M; Saida Y; Kobatake T; Yamanaka T; Saito N; Moriya Y
Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 25727933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
Fox NS; Melka S; Miller J; Bender S; Silverstein M; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
Homvises B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A randomized controlled trial of early versus delayed skin staple removal following caesarean section in the obese patient.
Nuthalapaty FS; Lee CM; Lee JH; Kuper SG; Higdon HL
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 May; 35(5):426-433. PubMed ID: 23756273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
Fitzwater JL; Jauk VC; Figueroa D; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Tita AT
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Sutures versus clips for skin closure following caesarean section: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Zaman S; Mohamedahmed AYY; Peterknecht E; Zakaria RM; Mohamedahmed SYY; Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Feb; 407(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 34232372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Mackeen AD; Khalifeh A; Fleisher J; Vogell A; Han C; Sendecki J; Pettker C; Leiby BE; Baxter JK; Sfakianaki A; Berghella V
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 24807325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Continuous vs interrupted sutures for single-layer closure of uterine incision at cesarean section.
Hohlagschwandtner M; Chalubinski K; Nather A; Husslein P; Joura EA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Apr; 268(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12673471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A barrier retractor to reduce surgical site infections and wound disruptions in obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Scolari Childress KM; Gavard JA; Ward DG; Berger K; Gross GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):285.e1-285.e10. PubMed ID: 26440690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).
Seiler CM; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Papyan A; Golcher H; Seidlmayer C; Franck A; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 19300233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
