These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980474)

  • 21. Use of personal computers and digitized film angiograms to produce subtraction angiograms.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE; Cesar LJ
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):401-7. PubMed ID: 8966296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distal lower extremity arteries: evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Lee HM; Wang Y; Sostman HD; Schwartz LH; Khilnani NM; Trost DW; Ramirez de Arellano E; Teeger S; Bush HL
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 9577502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Virtual digital subtraction angiography using multizone patch-based U-Net.
    Kimura R; Teramoto A; Ohno T; Saito K; Fujita H
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 43(4):1305-1315. PubMed ID: 33026591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital subtraction CT angiography based on efficient 3D registration and refinement.
    Kwon SM; Kim YS; Kim TS; Ra JB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Oct; 28(7):391-400. PubMed ID: 15464878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retrospective motion correction in digital subtraction angiography: a review.
    Meijering EH; Niesssen WJ; Viergever MA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):2-21. PubMed ID: 10193693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of head dual energy computed tomography angiography and neuro digital subtraction angiography].
    Xu Y; Wen L; Han D; Ma CW
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 21219804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improved detection of active multiple sclerosis lesions: 3D subtraction imaging.
    Moraal B; Wattjes MP; Geurts JJ; Knol DL; van Schijndel RA; Pouwels PJ; Vrenken H; Barkhof F
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 20308453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stereotactic radiation treatment planning and follow-up studies involving fused multimodality imaging.
    Hamm KD; Surber G; Schmücking M; Wurm RE; Aschenbach R; Kleinert G; Niesen A; Baum RP
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():326-33. PubMed ID: 15537185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Registration of 3D cerebral vessels with 2D digital angiograms: clinical evaluation.
    Bullitt E; Liu A; Aylward SR; Coffey C; Stone J; Mukherji SK; Muller KE; Pizer SM
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Sep; 6(9):539-46. PubMed ID: 10894063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Geometric quantitative coronary arteriography. A comparison of unsubtracted and dual energy-subtracted images.
    Weber DM; Molloi SY; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):649-54. PubMed ID: 1885271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normalized metal artifact reduction in head and neck computed tomography.
    Lell MM; Meyer E; Kuefner MA; May MS; Raupach R; Uder M; Kachelriess M
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Jul; 47(7):415-21. PubMed ID: 22659592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Post-processing central k-space subtraction for high-resolution arterial peripheral MR angiography.
    Gedat E; Mohajer M; Kirsch R; Frericks B
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jul; 29(6):835-43. PubMed ID: 21546189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correction of chemical shift misregistration by images from two different bandwidths.
    Zhu H; Demachi K; Pei C; Sekino M; Uesaka M
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 30(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 22316591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Digital densitometry and rapid determination of stroke volume and valve regurgitation].
    Onnasch DG; Jarrens U; Meissner F; Heintzen PH
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989; 34 Suppl():46-7. PubMed ID: 2819204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Application of the subtraction technic to arteriography of the head and neck region].
    Takahashi M; Ishibashi T; Takeda K; Kawanami H
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1969 Jun; 14(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 5195563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ANGIOGRAPHIC ARTEFACTS WHICH SIMULATE OR MASK ABNORMALITY.
    HERBERT WW
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Oct; 92():907-17. PubMed ID: 14215104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. GAGESIGHT: A Computer Vision System for Automatic Inspection of Instrument Gauges.
    Baird ML
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 1983 Jun; 5(6):618-21. PubMed ID: 21869148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Paralysis by analysis: Overcoming cardiac contraction with computer vision.
    Christoph J; Ripplinger CM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(42):e2314448120. PubMed ID: 37792520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of digital subtraction angiography for coronary artery.
    Yamamoto M; Okura Y; Ishihara M; Kagemoto M; Harada K; Ishida T
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 18351421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.