These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29804782)

  • 1. Homebirth organised in a caseload midwifery model with affiliation to a Danish university hospital - A descriptive study.
    Maimburg RD
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():82-85. PubMed ID: 29804782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The St. George Homebirth Program: an evaluation of the first 100 booked women.
    McMurtrie J; Catling-Paull C; Teate A; Caplice S; Chapman M; Homer C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 20070712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.
    Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A description of the management and outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean birth in the homebirth setting.
    Latendresse G; Murphy PA; Fullerton JT
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(5):386-91. PubMed ID: 16154065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The financial impact of offering publicly funded homebirths: A population-based microsimulation in Queensland, Australia.
    Hu Y; Allen J; Ellwood D; Slavin V; Gamble J; Toohill J; Callander E
    Women Birth; 2024 Feb; 37(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 37524616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfers to hospital in planned home birth in four Nordic countries - a prospective cohort study.
    Blix E; Kumle MH; Ingversen K; Huitfeldt AS; Hegaard HK; Ólafsdóttir ÓÁ; Øian P; Lindgren H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Apr; 95(4):420-8. PubMed ID: 26830511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Under scrutiny: Midwives' experience of intrapartum transfer from home to hospital within the context of a planned homebirth in Western Australia.
    Ball C; Hauck Y; Kuliukas L; Lewis L; Doherty D
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2016 Jun; 8():88-93. PubMed ID: 27179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Northampton homebirth team.
    O'Connell S; Richley A; Williams B
    Pract Midwife; 2012 Nov; 15(10):19-20, 22. PubMed ID: 23243828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Birthplace in Australia: Processes and interactions during the intrapartum transfer of women from planned homebirth to hospital.
    Fox D; Sheehan A; Homer C
    Midwifery; 2018 Feb; 57():18-25. PubMed ID: 29144977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey.
    Sassine H; Burns E; Ormsby S; Dahlen HG
    Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 32636161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From hospital to home: Australian midwives' experiences of transitioning into publicly-funded homebirth programs.
    Coddington R; Catling C; Homer CS
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27594344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A
    Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 years.
    Catling-Paull C; Coddington RL; Foureur MJ; Homer CS; ;
    Med J Aust; 2013 Jun; 198(11):616-20. PubMed ID: 23919710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned homebirth in Catalonia (Spain): A descriptive study.
    Alcaraz-Vidal L; Escuriet R; Sàrries Zgonc I; Robleda G
    Midwifery; 2021 Jul; 98():102977. PubMed ID: 33751929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned homebirths in Western Australia 1981-1987: a descriptive study.
    Woodcock HC; Read AW; Moore DJ; Stanley FJ; Bower C
    Med J Aust; 1990 Dec 3-17; 153(11-12):672-8. PubMed ID: 2246990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
    Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
    Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
    Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
    Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study.
    Rowe RE; Townend J; Brocklehurst P; Knight M; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Newburn M; Redshaw M; Sandall J; Silverton L; Hollowell J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Dec; 13():224. PubMed ID: 24314134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AJOG against homebirth.
    Cohain JS
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2013; (105):33. PubMed ID: 23581199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.