595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29804829)
1. Kinetics and Fidelity of the Repair of Cas9-Induced Double-Strand DNA Breaks.
Brinkman EK; Chen T; de Haas M; Holland HA; Akhtar W; van Steensel B
Mol Cell; 2018 Jun; 70(5):801-813.e6. PubMed ID: 29804829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-Strand Annealing Plays a Major Role in Double-Strand DNA Break Repair following CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage in
Zhang WW; Matlashewski G
mSphere; 2019 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31434745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The democratization of gene editing: Insights from site-specific cleavage and double-strand break repair.
Jasin M; Haber JE
DNA Repair (Amst); 2016 Aug; 44():6-16. PubMed ID: 27261202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Small Molecular Inhibitors of DNA Double Strand Break Repair Pathways Increase the ANTI-HBV Activity of CRISPR/Cas9].
Kostyusheva AP; Kostyushev DS; Brezgin SA; Zarifyan DN; Volchkova EV; Chulanov VP
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2019; 53(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 31099781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CRISPR-Cas9 fusion to dominant-negative 53BP1 enhances HDR and inhibits NHEJ specifically at Cas9 target sites.
Jayavaradhan R; Pillis DM; Goodman M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Andreassen PR; Malik P
Nat Commun; 2019 Jun; 10(1):2866. PubMed ID: 31253785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease enhances homology-directed repair.
Savic N; Ringnalda FC; Lindsay H; Berk C; Bargsten K; Li Y; Neri D; Robinson MD; Ciaudo C; Hall J; Jinek M; Schwank G
Elife; 2018 May; 7():. PubMed ID: 29809142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era.
Salsman J; Dellaire G
Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the Fanconi anemia pathway.
Richardson CD; Kazane KR; Feng SJ; Zelin E; Bray NL; Schäfer AJ; Floor SN; Corn JE
Nat Genet; 2018 Aug; 50(8):1132-1139. PubMed ID: 30054595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. INDEL detection, the 'Achilles heel' of precise genome editing: a survey of methods for accurate profiling of gene editing induced indels.
Bennett EP; Petersen BL; Johansen IE; Niu Y; Yang Z; Chamberlain CA; Met Ö; Wandall HH; Frödin M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Dec; 48(21):11958-11981. PubMed ID: 33170255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA Repair Pathway Choices in CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing.
Xue C; Greene EC
Trends Genet; 2021 Jul; 37(7):639-656. PubMed ID: 33896583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precise and Predictable CRISPR Chromosomal Rearrangements Reveal Principles of Cas9-Mediated Nucleotide Insertion.
Shou J; Li J; Liu Y; Wu Q
Mol Cell; 2018 Aug; 71(4):498-509.e4. PubMed ID: 30033371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exogenous gene integration mediated by genome editing technologies in zebrafish.
Morita H; Taimatsu K; Yanagi K; Kawahara A
Bioengineered; 2017 May; 8(3):287-295. PubMed ID: 28272984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Target binding and residence: a new determinant of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
Feng Y; Liu S; Chen R; Xie A
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2021 Jan; 22(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 33448189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ectopic expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves homology-directed repair during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.
Paulsen BS; Mandal PK; Frock RL; Boyraz B; Yadav R; Upadhyayula S; Gutierrez-Martinez P; Ebina W; Fasth A; Kirchhausen T; Talkowski ME; Agarwal S; Alt FW; Rossi DJ
Nat Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 1(11):878-888. PubMed ID: 31015609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing.
Tatiossian KJ; Clark RDE; Huang C; Thornton ME; Grubbs BH; Cannon PM
Mol Ther; 2021 Mar; 29(3):1057-1069. PubMed ID: 33160457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of chromatin context on Cas9-induced DNA double-strand break repair pathway balance.
Schep R; Brinkman EK; Leemans C; Vergara X; van der Weide RH; Morris B; van Schaik T; Manzo SG; Peric-Hupkes D; van den Berg J; Beijersbergen RL; Medema RH; van Steensel B
Mol Cell; 2021 May; 81(10):2216-2230.e10. PubMed ID: 33848455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Target residence of Cas9-sgRNA influences DNA double-strand break repair pathway choices in CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
Liu SC; Feng YL; Sun XN; Chen RD; Liu Q; Xiao JJ; Zhang JN; Huang ZC; Xiang JF; Chen GQ; Yang Y; Lou C; Li HD; Cai Z; Xu SM; Lin H; Xie AY
Genome Biol; 2022 Aug; 23(1):165. PubMed ID: 35915475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endogenous sequence patterns predispose the repair modes of CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA double-stranded breaks in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Vu GTH; Cao HX; Fauser F; Reiss B; Puchta H; Schubert I
Plant J; 2017 Oct; 92(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 28696528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CAS9 is a genome mutator by directly disrupting DNA-PK dependent DNA repair pathway.
Xu S; Kim J; Tang Q; Chen Q; Liu J; Xu Y; Fu X
Protein Cell; 2020 May; 11(5):352-365. PubMed ID: 32170574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative assessment of HR and NHEJ activities via CRISPR/Cas9-induced oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated DSB repair.
Du J; Yin N; Xie T; Zheng Y; Xia N; Shang J; Chen F; Zhang H; Yu J; Liu F
DNA Repair (Amst); 2018 Oct; 70():67-71. PubMed ID: 30212742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
