167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980547)
21. [Intracranial distribution of iohexol and iotrolan after cervical myelography].
Fiirgaard B; Madsen HH; Svare U; Skjødt T; Zeeberg I
Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 Jul; 157(27):3901-4. PubMed ID: 7645065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Iotrolan-300 versus Iopamidol-300 in hysterosalpingography].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Bauer M; Henne KW
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Sep; 1(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 1751562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outpatient lumbar radiculography: comparison of iopamidol and iohexol and a literature review.
Davies AM; Evans N; Chandy J
Br J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 62(740):716-23. PubMed ID: 2670034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of iohexol with metrizamide in myelography.
Sortland O; Nestvold K; Kloster R; Aandahl MH
Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):121-2. PubMed ID: 6701301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Iohexol: summary of North American and European clinical trials in adult lumbar, thoracic, and cervical myelography with a new nonionic contrast medium.
Shaw DD; Bach-Gansmo T; Dahlstrom K
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S44-50. PubMed ID: 3882616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Preclinical evaluation of iotrolan as a contrast medium for angiography and urography].
Miyazawa T; Murayama C; Uchimoto R; Fritz-Zieroth B
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Sep; 52(9):1287-98. PubMed ID: 1437534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 2 nonionic contrast media for myelography].
Lovrencić M; Klanfar Z; Jakovac I
Lijec Vjesn; 1986 Apr; 108(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 3520199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical trials with iotrolan in myelographic and computed tomography applications in the United States.
Goldstein HA; Pfennig D
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():167-70. PubMed ID: 2568788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media].
Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Neurotoxicity of iohexol vs iopamidol in lumbar myelography. Clinical, electrophysiological and brain CT scan correlations.
Floras P; Deliac P; Gross C; Jouet P; Paty J; Caille JM
J Neuroradiol; 1990; 17(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 2286841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Clinical use of low osmolar roentgen contrast media].
Taenzer V
Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Oct; 37(10):357-61. PubMed ID: 6505858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The difference of contrast effects of myelography in normal dogs: comparison of iohexol (180 mgI/ml), iohexol (240 mgI/ml) and iotrolan (240 mgI/ml).
Shimizu J; Yamada K; Kishimoto M; Iwasaki T; Miyake Y
J Vet Med Sci; 2008 Jul; 70(7):659-63. PubMed ID: 18685236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Iohexol 240 mgr I/ml and metrizamide 240 mgr I/ml in lumbar myelography. Report from a randomized double blind study.
Valk J; Hazenberg GJ; van Duijn H; Crezee F; Olislagers-De Slegte R
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 3522040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Comparative evaluation of 2 non-ionic contrast media, iopentol (350 mgI/ml) and iopamidol (370 mgI/ml) in coronary angiography].
Maddestra N; Di Cesare A; Salute L; Toppetti A; Minguzzi P; Marelli C; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 7997610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of dimeric radiographic contrast medium iotrolan on Swine renal arteries: comparison with monomeric contrast media iohexol and iomeprol.
Heinrich M; Schneider G; Grgic A; Humke U; Kramann B; Uder M
Invest Radiol; 2004 Jul; 39(7):406-12. PubMed ID: 15194911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adverse reactions in myelography.
Maly P; Sundgren P; Baath L; Golman K; Walday P
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 399():230-7. PubMed ID: 8610521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Animal experimental myelography in the pig. A comparison between iohexol and iotrolan.
Skalpe IO; Tang GJ
Invest Radiol; 1995 Apr; 30(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 7635674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diffusion of contrast media in cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of iohexol, iopamidol and iotrolan in vitro.
Raininko R; Teräväinen H
Neuroradiology; 1992; 34(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 1630618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Adverse reactions to iopamidol and iohexol myelography with special attention to headache: role of myelographic technique.
Sobel DF; Rowe R; Zyroff J; Koziol JA; Frost F; Krupsaw J
Headache; 1989 Sep; 29(8):519-22. PubMed ID: 2793457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Iotrolan versus iopamidol for radiculography: a randomized double-blind study.
Coutinho C; McGeorge A; Macpherson P; Teasdale E
Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):89-90. PubMed ID: 3280064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
