These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29806021)

  • 1. Evolutionary divergence in competitive mating success through female mating bias for good genes.
    Dugand RJ; Kennington WJ; Tomkins JL
    Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaaq0369. PubMed ID: 29806021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy-sperm?
    Evans JP; Simmons LW
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 17619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular evidence supports a genic capture resolution of the lek paradox.
    Dugand RJ; Tomkins JL; Kennington WJ
    Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1359. PubMed ID: 30911052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Males from populations with higher competitive mating success produce sons with lower fitness.
    Nguyen TTX; Moehring AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):528-534. PubMed ID: 30811733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polymorphisms in a desaturase 2 ortholog associate with cuticular hydrocarbon and male mating success variation in a natural population of Drosophila serrata.
    Ivory-Church J; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1600-9. PubMed ID: 26104145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural selection stops the evolution of male attractiveness.
    Hine E; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Mar; 108(9):3659-64. PubMed ID: 21321197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Costs and benefits of giant sperm and sperm storage organs in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Zajitschek S; Zajitschek F; Josway S; Al Shabeeb R; Weiner H; Manier MK
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1300-1309. PubMed ID: 31465604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The deleterious effects of high inbreeding on male Drosophila melanogaster attractiveness are observed under competitive but not under non-competitive conditions.
    Valtonen TM; Roff DA; Rantala MJ
    Behav Genet; 2014 Mar; 44(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 24413901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic variation but weak genetic covariation between pre- and post-copulatory episodes of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Travers LM; Garcia-Gonzalez F; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):1535-52. PubMed ID: 27159063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between environmental stress and male mating success may enhance evolutionary divergence of stress-resistant Drosophila populations.
    Gefen E; Gibbs AG
    Evolution; 2009 Jun; 63(6):1653-9. PubMed ID: 19187243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative trait locus analysis of male mating success and sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hughes KA; Leips J
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1427-34. PubMed ID: 16929659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female Life-History Trade-Offs and the Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D
    Am Nat; 2018 Oct; 192(4):448-460. PubMed ID: 30205025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual selection reveals a cost of pathogen resistance undetected in life-history assays.
    Kawecki TJ
    Evolution; 2020 Feb; 74(2):338-348. PubMed ID: 31814118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution of divergent female mating preference in response to experimental sexual selection.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2524-33. PubMed ID: 24931497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males.
    McGuigan K; Petfield D; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2011 Oct; 65(10):2816-29. PubMed ID: 21967424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.