174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29806335)
21. A novel "four-rod technique" for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction: theory and technical considerations.
Shen FH; Harper M; Foster WC; Marks I; Arlet V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1395-401. PubMed ID: 16721307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spinal pelvic reconstruction after total sacrectomy for en bloc resection of a giant sacral chordoma. Technical note.
Gallia GL; Haque R; Garonzik I; Witham TF; Khavkin YA; Wolinsky JP; Suk I; Gokaslan ZL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Dec; 3(6):501-6. PubMed ID: 16381216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sacral tumor resection and the impact on pelvic incidence.
Gottfried ON; Omeis I; Mehta VA; Solakoglu C; Gokaslan ZL; Wolinsky JP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 21142465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: Galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws.
Peelle MW; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Sides B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2392-8; discussion 2399. PubMed ID: 16985470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical advantages of dual over single iliac screws in lumbo-iliac fixation construct.
Yu BS; Zhuang XM; Zheng ZM; Li ZM; Wang TP; Lu WW
Eur Spine J; 2010 Jul; 19(7):1121-8. PubMed ID: 20195650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reconstruction after total sacrectomy: early experience with a new surgical technique.
Dickey ID; Hugate RR; Fuchs B; Yaszemski MJ; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Sep; 438():42-50. PubMed ID: 16131868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gait-simulating fatigue loading analysis and sagittal alignment failure of spinal pelvic reconstruction after total sacrectomy: comparison of 3 techniques.
Clark AJ; Tang JA; Leasure JM; Ivan ME; Kondrashov D; Buckley JM; Deviren V; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):364-70. PubMed ID: 24460580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. En bloc sacrectomy and reconstruction: technique modification for pelvic fixation.
Newman CB; Keshavarzi S; Aryan HE
Surg Neurol; 2009 Dec; 72(6):752-6; discussion 756. PubMed ID: 19665193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical evaluation of reconstructed lumbosacral spine after total sacrectomy.
Murakami H; Kawahara N; Tomita K; Sakamoto J; Oda J
J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 12486469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Comparison of Early Clinical and Radiographic Complications of Iliac Screw Fixation Versus S2 Alar Iliac (S2AI) Fixation in the Adult and Pediatric Populations.
Ilyas H; Place H; Puryear A
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E199-205. PubMed ID: 25627809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A biomechanical comparison of different types of lumbopelvic fixation.
Tis JE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):E866-72. PubMed ID: 19910754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A finite element analysis of the pelvic reconstruction using fibular transplantation fixed with four different rod-screw systems after type I resection.
Jia YW; Cheng LM; Yu GR; DU CF; Yang ZY; Yu Y; Ding ZQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Feb; 121(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 18304464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What Are the Functional Outcomes After Total Sacrectomy Without Spinopelvic Reconstruction?
Kiatisevi P; Piyaskulkaew C; Kunakornsawat S; Sukunthanak B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):643-655. PubMed ID: 26911974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of screw length and bone cement augmentation on the fixation strength of iliac screws: a biomechanical study.
Zheng ZM; Zhang KB; Zhang JF; Yu BS; Liu H; Zhuang XM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):545-50. PubMed ID: 19956027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery Using a Dual-Rod Technique with Diverse U-Shaped Rods After Posterior En Bloc Partial Sacrectomy for a Sacral Tumor: 2 Case Reports and a Literature Review.
Choi MK; Jo DJ; Kim SB
World Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 95():619.e11-619.e18. PubMed ID: 27544341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up.
Sponseller PD; Zimmerman RM; Ko PS; Pull Ter Gunne AF; Mohamed AS; Chang TL; Kebaish KM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(20):1887-92. PubMed ID: 20802390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of stability of two kinds of sacro-iliac screws in the fixation of bilateral sacral fractures in a finite element model.
Zhao Y; Li J; Wang D; Liu Y; Tan J; Zhang S
Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):490-4. PubMed ID: 22281196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation.
Emami A; Deviren V; Berven S; Smith JA; Hu SS; Bradford DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):776-86. PubMed ID: 11923673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
