169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29806535)
1. Appraisal; the next steps?
Cameron N
Educ Prim Care; 2018 Jul; 29(4):189-191. PubMed ID: 29806535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.
Davies H; Khera N; Stroobant J
Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15665172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.
Finlay K; McLaren S
Qual Prim Care; 2009; 17(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20051189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Authentic performance appraisal: when home is the workplace.
O'Connor M; Lee S
Int J Palliat Nurs; 2007 Dec; 13(12):606-9. PubMed ID: 18399386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
Wakeling J; Cameron N
Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical appraisal and revalidation: can it improve patient care?
Caesar S; Locke R; Scallan S
Educ Prim Care; 2013 Sep; 24(6):398-400. PubMed ID: 24196594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal.
Curnock E; Bowie P; Pope L; McKay J
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22443714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London's responsible officers and their appraisers.
Griffin A; Furmedge DS; Gill D; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Noble L; Field R; Ingham Clark C
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 15():152. PubMed ID: 26392086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revalidation is not to be feared and can be achieved by continuous objective assessment.
Bolsin SN; Cawson E; Colson ME
Med J Aust; 2015 Aug; 203(3):142-4, 144e.1. PubMed ID: 26224185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GP experiences of partner and external peer appraisal: a qualitative study.
McKinstry B; Peacock H; Shaw J
Br J Gen Pract; 2005 Jul; 55(516):539-43. PubMed ID: 16004740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revalidation, appraisal and multisource feedback for occupational physicians.
Nimmo S
Occup Med (Lond); 2017 Aug; 67(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 28898972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
Rubin P
Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacists' and pharmacy technicians' views on a process of revalidation of pharmacy professionals in Great Britain.
Potter H; Hassell K; Noyce PR
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2013; 9(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 23517656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Managing the appraisal.
Parkin D; McKimm J
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2009 Sep; 70(9):528-31. PubMed ID: 19749644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors' views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom.
Archer J; Nunn S; Regan de Bere S
Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):994-1000. PubMed ID: 28756852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
