363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29807735)
1. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of repeated ceramic firings on the marginal and internal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM technologies.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Albayrak H; Kilinc HI; Gümüs HÖ
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):672-677. PubMed ID: 28385435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
Zeng L; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Wei B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Discrepancies of Co-Cr Metal Copings Prepared via CAD/CAM and Conventional Casting.
Dayan SC; Kiseri B; Gencel B; Kurt A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 30762994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Yildirim B; Paken G
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
Sarda AS; Bedia SV
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies.
Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç Hİ; Albayrak H; Kara M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 27130177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
