363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29807735)
41.
Gurel K; Toksavul S; Toman M; Tamac E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 22(6):812-816. PubMed ID: 31187767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influence of Material Selection on the Marginal Accuracy of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Metal- and All-Ceramic Single Crown Copings.
Rödiger M; Schneider L; Rinke S
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2143906. PubMed ID: 29765979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of repeated firings on marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different techniques.
Önöral Ö; Ulusoy M; Seker E; Etikan İ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):415-420. PubMed ID: 29627208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations.
Tan PL; Gratton DG; Diaz-Arnold AM; Holmes DC
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jul; 17(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 18355167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Marginal Gap of Milled versus Cast Gold Restorations.
Johnson R; Verrett R; Haney S; Mansueto M; Challa S
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 26845495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of Anti-Rotational Abutment Features and Novel Computerized Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings.
Aktas G; Guncu MB; Akcin ET; Cakan U; Canay S
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):252-256. PubMed ID: 32964601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of milling systems and marginal configurations on the fit of yttrium stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP)' copings.
Al-Aali KA; Bin-Shuwaish MS; Alhenaki AM; Al Ahdal K; Al Deeb L; Maawadh AM; AlHelal A; Alshehri H; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020924514. PubMed ID: 33356766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reproducibility of different arrangement of resin copings by dental microstereolithography: Evaluating the marginal discrepancy of resin copings.
Kim DY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):260-265. PubMed ID: 27646792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The effect of veneering on the marginal fit of CAD/CAM-generated, copy-milled, and cast metal copings.
Ates SM; Yesil Duymus Z; Caglar I; Hologlu B
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2553-2560. PubMed ID: 28091875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings.
Hmaidouch R; Neumann P; Mueller WD
Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 22141231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
Rai R; Kumar SA; Prabhu R; Govindan RT; Tanveer FM
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD/CAM and Conventional Wax up Techniques.
Vojdani M; Torabi K; Farjood E; Khaledi A
J Dent (Shiraz); 2013 Sep; 14(3):118-29. PubMed ID: 24724133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloy copings manufactured by microstereolithography.
Kim DY; Kim CM; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 9(3):176-181. PubMed ID: 28680548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia.
Bae SY; Park JY; Jeong ID; Kim HY; Kim JH; Kim WC
J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 27484816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
