These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29807816)

  • 1. Random Versus Nonrandom Peer Review: A Case for More Meaningful Peer Review.
    Itri JN; Donithan A; Patel SH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 29807816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Yield of Learning Opportunities From a Radiology Random Peer Review Program.
    Trinh TW; Shinagare AB; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):630-634. PubMed ID: 30016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Focused peer review: the end game of peer review.
    Hussain S; Hussain JS; Karam A; Vijayaraghavan G
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jun; 9(6):430-3.e1. PubMed ID: 22632671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
    Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
    Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Error Categorization at Abdominal Imaging Peer Learning Conference.
    Del Gaizo AJ; Itri JN; Pendergrast TE; Tappouni R
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(6):535-542. PubMed ID: 30244814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The next level of radiology peer review: enterprise-wide education and improvement.
    Butler GJ; Forghani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 23642877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid response team activations within 24 hours of admission from the emergency department: an innovative approach for performance improvement.
    Lovett PB; Massone RJ; Holmes MN; Hall RV; Lopez BL
    Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Jun; 21(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 25039551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
    Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
    Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.
    O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Jun; 28(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 26892609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving Radiology Peer Learning: Comparing a Novel Electronic Peer Learning Tool and a Traditional Score-Based Peer Review System.
    Trinh TW; Boland GW; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 30403533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
    Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A crisis in confidence: a combined challenge and opportunity for medical imaging providers.
    Reiner BI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 24332819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
    Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a peer-learning program in an academic abdominal radiology practice and comparison with a traditional peer-review system.
    Ludwig DR; Strnad BS; Bierhals AJ; Mellnick VM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Jul; 47(7):2509-2519. PubMed ID: 35482105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transition From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Experience in a Radiology Department.
    Donnelly LF; Dorfman SR; Jones J; Bisset GS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Aug; 15(8):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 29055610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT.
    McCreadie G; Oliver TB
    Clin Radiol; 2009 May; 64(5):491-9; discussion 500-1. PubMed ID: 19348844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice.
    Rutherford A
    Aust Fam Physician; 2011; 40(1-2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21301690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collection.
    Brook OR; Romero J; Brook A; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Levine D
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):221-9. PubMed ID: 25188432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data-Driven Quality Improvement Project to Increase the Value of the Congenital Echocardiographic Report.
    Jone PN; Gould R; Barrett C; Younoszai AK; Fonseca B
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 39(4):726-730. PubMed ID: 29350246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.