BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29807961)

  • 1. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel surface roughness after debonding.
    Karan S; Kircelli BH; Tasdelen B
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20677958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of orthodontic debonding and residual adhesive removal on 3D enamel microroughness.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Tomkowski R; Tandecka K; Stepien P; Szatkiewicz T; Sporniak-Tutak K; Grocholewicz K
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2558. PubMed ID: 27761343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods.
    Eliades T; Gioka C; Eliades G; Makou M
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 15222720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of enamel surface following five composite removal methods after bracket debonding.
    Hong YH; Lew KK
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7781720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration.
    Boncuk Y; Cehreli ZC; Polat-Özsoy Ö
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 24313735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.
    Webb BJ; Koch J; Hagan JL; Ballard RW; Armbruster PC
    J Orthod; 2016 Mar; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26282121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1998; 65(5):313-7, 354. PubMed ID: 9795734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness after Various Finishing Techniques for Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets.
    Erdur EA; Akın M; Cime L; İleri Z
    Turk J Orthod; 2016 Mar; 29(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 30112465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of debonding of orthodontic brackets on topography and surface roughness of composite restorations.
    Moradi M; Hormozi E; Shamohammadi M; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2018 Dec; 16(4):623-637. PubMed ID: 30343063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer.
    Hosein I; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 15592221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.