These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29807963)

  • 1. Evaluation of Predictability of Suitable Implant Lengths as related to Accurate Treatment Planning using Recent Roentgenographic Measures: A Key to Success.
    Suvarna S; Singh RK; Pachar RB; Kundra S; Arya S; Mehta LK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 29807963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Different Preosteotomy Determinants as Affecting the Success of Implant Therapy: A "CBCT"-based Clinical Study.
    Jain S; Kapoor K; Sethi K; Dahiya DR; Singh B; Sangwan R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Oct; 20(10):1212-1216. PubMed ID: 31883259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of cone-beam computed tomography on implant planning and on prediction of implant size.
    Mello LA; Garcia RR; Leles JL; Leles CR; Silva MA
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():46-53. PubMed ID: 25000596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of Three-dimensional Imaging on Implant Treatment Planning: Implant Diameter and Length.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Clemens W; Zitzmann NU; Schulze RK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):704-711. PubMed ID: 29959300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative Assessment of Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in evaluating Bone Density at Posterior Mandibular Implant Site.
    Dahiya K; Kumar N; Bajaj P; Sharma A; Sikka R; Dahiya S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 29728548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education.
    Dau M; Edalatpour A; Schulze R; Al-Nawas B; Alshihri A; Kämmerer PW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):20160081. PubMed ID: 27759998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
    Sennerby L; Andersson P; Pagliani L; Giani C; Moretti G; Molinari M; Motroni A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?
    Deeb G; Antonos L; Tack S; Carrico C; Laskin D; Deeb JG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 75(2):285-289. PubMed ID: 27912075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does cone-beam CT alter treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative implant planning using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
    Guerrero ME; Noriega J; Castro C; Jacobs R
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Jun; 44(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 24944961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
    de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
    Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.