BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29808038)

  • 21. Profile of intrauterine contraceptive device acceptors at the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria.
    Abasiattai AM; Bassey EA; Udoma EJ
    Ann Afr Med; 2008 Mar; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18702241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
    Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
    Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Postpartum Insertion Of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Safe And Effective Contraception.
    Fatima S; Rehman A; Ahmed Z; Sajid MM; Habiba U; Rehman A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2022; 34(Suppl 1)(3):S671-S677. PubMed ID: 36414588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intrauterine device insertion in the postpartum period: a systematic review.
    Sonalkar S; Kapp N
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2015 Feb; 20(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 25397890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Immediate postplacental insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device during cesarean section.
    Çelen Ş; Sucak A; Yıldız Y; Danışman N
    Contraception; 2011 Sep; 84(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 21843687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Assiut experience.
    Mohamed SA; Kamel MA; Shaaban OM; Salem HT
    Med Princ Pract; 2003; 12(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12766335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study.
    Goldthwaite LM; Sheeder J; Hyer J; Tocce K; Teal SB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 217(6):674.e1-674.e8. PubMed ID: 28826801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.
    Wildemeersch D; Goldstuck ND; Hasskamp T
    Dev Period Med; 2016; 20(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27416620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. IUD insertion at cesarean section--the Chinese experience.
    Chi IC; Ji G; Siemens AJ; Waszak CS
    Adv Contracept; 1986 Jun; 2(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 3535432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Post-Placental Intrauterine Device Insertion in Brazilian Adolescents: Clinical Outcomes at 12 Months.
    Giovanelli SA; Torloni MR; Guazzelli CAF
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 35(3):336-340. PubMed ID: 34737030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Diedrich JT; Klein DA; Peipert JF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):364.e1-364.e12. PubMed ID: 28038902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The introduction of postpartum intrauterine devices in the People's Republic of China.
    Wen ZS; Lin L; Laufe LE; Dixon B
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Apr; 21(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 6136435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Programmatic experience of post-partum IUD use in Zambia: an observational study on continuation and satisfaction.
    Blumenthal PD; Chakraborty NM; Prager S; Gupta P; Lerma K; Vwalika B
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Oct; 21(5):356-60. PubMed ID: 27367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preliminary report on a postpartum CuT 200 study, Santiago, Chile.
    Lavin P; Waszak C; Bravo C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1983 Feb; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 6133798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-week postpartum intrauterine contraception insertion: a study of feasibility, patient acceptability and short-term outcomes.
    Zerden ML; Stuart GS; Charm S; Bryant A; Garrett J; Morse J
    Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 27554014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrauterine Copper Device (CuT380A) as a Contraceptive Method in the Indian Context: Acceptability, Safety and Efficacy Depending on the Timing of Insertion.
    Gupta P; Gupta MM; Sharma R
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2018 Apr; 68(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 29662283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Celen S; Möröy P; Sucak A; Aktulay A; Danişman N
    Contraception; 2004 Apr; 69(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 15033401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy and Satisfaction Rate in Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion: A Prospective Study.
    Iftikhar PM; Shaheen N; Arora E
    Cureus; 2019 Sep; 11(9):e5646. PubMed ID: 31700748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Insertion technique, not design, affects expulsion rates of postpartum intrauterine device.
    Stumpf PG; Lenker RM
    Contraception; 1984 Oct; 30(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 6509985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.