These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29808504)

  • 1. Preferences for models of peer support in the digital era: A cross-sectional survey of people with cancer.
    Boyes A; Turon H; Hall A; Watson R; Proietto A; Sanson-Fisher R
    Psychooncology; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2148-2154. PubMed ID: 29808504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What models of peer support do people with colorectal cancer prefer?
    Ieropoli SC; White VM; Jefford M; Akkerman D
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2011 Jul; 20(4):455-65. PubMed ID: 20738390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Not asking cancer patients about their preferences does make a difference. A cross-sectional study examining cancer patients' preferred and perceived role in decision-making regarding their last important cancer treatment.
    Herrmann A; Hall A; Sanson-Fisher R; Zdenkowski N; Watson R; Turon H
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Sep; 27(5):e12871. PubMed ID: 29900611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.
    Batenburg A; Das E
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Nov; 16(11):e256. PubMed ID: 25474819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer support need fulfillment among adults with spinal cord injury: relationships with participation, life satisfaction and individual characteristics.
    Sweet SN; Noreau L; Leblond J; Martin Ginis KA
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(6):558-65. PubMed ID: 26017541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.
    Setoyama Y; Yamazaki Y; Namayama K
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e122. PubMed ID: 22204869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preferences for cancer support group topics and group satisfaction among patients and caregivers.
    Morse KD; Gralla RJ; Petersen JA; Rosen LM
    J Psychosoc Oncol; 2014; 32(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 24428254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Japanese Cancer Survivors' Awareness of and Participation in Support Groups.
    Hatano Y; Mitsuki S; Hosokawa T; Fukui K
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Feb; 33(1):208-213. PubMed ID: 28168683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the Characteristics and Preferences for Online Support Groups: Mixed Method Study.
    Plinsinga ML; Besomi M; Maclachlan L; Melo L; Robbins S; Lawford BJ; Teo PL; Mills K; Setchell J; Egerton T; Eyles J; Hall L; Mellor R; Hunter DJ; Hodges P; Vicenzino B; Bennell K
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Dec; 21(12):e15987. PubMed ID: 31793893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Person-centred care in chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study of patients' desires for self-management support.
    Havas K; Douglas C; Bonner A
    BMC Nephrol; 2017 Jan; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 28086812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A closer lens: Cancer survivors' supportive intervention preferences and interventions received.
    Arch JJ; Vanderkruik R; Kirk A; Carr AL
    Psychooncology; 2018 May; 27(5):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 28792097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of online support group format (moderated vs peer-led) on depressive symptoms and extent of participation in women with breast cancer.
    Klemm P
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2012 Jan; 30(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22240564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating peer support for prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Peer Support Inventory.
    Steginga SK; Pinnock C; Gardner M; Gardiner RA; Dunn J
    BJU Int; 2005 Jan; 95(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 15663527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health-Related Internet Use in People With Cancer: Results From a Cross-Sectional Study in Two Outpatient Clinics in Sweden.
    Mattsson S; Olsson EMG; Johansson B; Carlsson M
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e163. PubMed ID: 28506959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of engagement in face-to-face and online patient support groups.
    Van Uden-Kraan CF; Drossaert CH; Taal E; Smit WM; Bernelot Moens HJ; Van de Laar MA
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):e106. PubMed ID: 22155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions of Telehealth-Based Cancer Support Groups at a Rural Community Oncology Program.
    Holtz BE; Mitchell KM; Strand D; Hirko K
    J Cancer Educ; 2024 Aug; 39(4):418-425. PubMed ID: 38539005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting cancer patients' participation in support groups: a longitudinal study.
    Grande G; Arnott J; Brundle C; Pilling M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Aug; 96(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 24862910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferences regarding disclosure of prognosis and end-of-life care: A survey of cancer patients with advanced disease in a lower-middle-income country.
    Zafar W; Hafeez H; Jamshed A; Shah MA; Quader A; Yusuf MA
    Palliat Med; 2016 Jul; 30(7):661-73. PubMed ID: 26769733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.
    Huber J; Muck T; Maatz P; Keck B; Enders P; Maatouk I; Ihrig A
    J Cancer Surviv; 2018 Feb; 12(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28861845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.