These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980883)
21. Quality improvement in medicare. Turkel RA J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Aug; 82(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 7561735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality assurance and medical stupidity. Glover JL Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 1928988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. PRO update. Transition from the third to fourth scope of work. Baker NA Mich Med; 1992 Apr; 91(4):42, 45-7. PubMed ID: 1614338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care. Rothschild RD Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Taking the PROs down a new road to quality. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig. Jencks SF Internist; 1992 Oct; 33(9):20-3. PubMed ID: 10121373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Why the OSMA should not bid to become Ohio's utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO). Porter S Ohio State Med J; 1984 Jun; 80(6):421-7. PubMed ID: 6540427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medicare program; peer review organization contracts: solicitation of statements of interest from in-state organizations--Alaska, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wyoming--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(145):40534-6. PubMed ID: 10181715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein. Weiser RR Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Peer review shifts focus to patterns of care. Carlson B Indiana Med; 1994; 87(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 7806858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. PSRO: an evaluation of the Professional Standards Review Organization. J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(3):87-9. PubMed ID: 10308911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. HCFA's close encounter with CQI. QRC Advis; 1992 May; 8(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 10118704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]