These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29809005)

  • 21. Prediction on the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds using quantum chemistry descriptors based QSAR and machine learning derived classification methods.
    Hao Y; Sun G; Fan T; Sun X; Liu Y; Zhang N; Zhao L; Zhong R; Peng Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Dec; 186():109822. PubMed ID: 31634658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22.
    Sedykh AY; Shah RR; Kleinstreuer NC; Auerbach SS; Gombar VK
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 34(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 33356152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative Analysis of QSAR-based vs. Chemical Similarity Based Predictors of GPCRs Binding Affinity.
    Luo M; Wang XS; Tropsha A
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 27491652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of in-house and off-the-shelf in silico models: implications on guidance for mutagenicity assessment.
    Jolly R; Ahmed KB; Zwickl C; Watson I; Gombar V
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 71(3):388-97. PubMed ID: 25656493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chembench: a cheminformatics workbench.
    Walker T; Grulke CM; Pozefsky D; Tropsha A
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Dec; 26(23):3000-1. PubMed ID: 20889496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
    Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Current approaches for choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR).
    Khan PM; Roy K
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2018 Dec; 13(12):1075-1089. PubMed ID: 30372648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiobjective optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationships: deriving accurate and interpretable QSARs.
    Nicolotti O; Gillet VJ; Fleming PJ; Green DV
    J Med Chem; 2002 Nov; 45(23):5069-80. PubMed ID: 12408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accurate and interpretable computational modeling of chemical mutagenicity.
    Langham JJ; Jain AN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1833-9. PubMed ID: 18771257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ensemble feature selection: consistent descriptor subsets for multiple QSAR models.
    Dutta D; Guha R; Wild D; Chen T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(3):989-97. PubMed ID: 17407280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integrating QSAR and read-across for environmental assessment.
    Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Petoumenou MI; Cappelli CI; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):605-18. PubMed ID: 26535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Novel Consensus Architecture To Improve Performance of Large-Scale Multitask Deep Learning QSAR Models.
    Zakharov AV; Zhao T; Nguyen DT; Peryea T; Sheils T; Yasgar A; Huang R; Southall N; Simeonov A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4613-4624. PubMed ID: 31584270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ChemModLab: a web-based cheminformatics modeling laboratory.
    Hughes-Oliver JM; Brooks AD; Welch WJ; Khaledi MG; Hawkins D; Young SS; Patil K; Howell GW; Ng RT; Chu MT
    In Silico Biol; 2011-2012; 11(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 22475752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction reliability of QSAR models: an overview of various validation tools.
    De P; Kar S; Ambure P; Roy K
    Arch Toxicol; 2022 May; 96(5):1279-1295. PubMed ID: 35267067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology.
    Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 12546547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. PreS/MD: Predictor of Sensitization Hazard for Chemical Substances Released From Medical Devices.
    Alves VM; Borba JVB; Braga RC; Korn DR; Kleinstreuer N; Causey K; Tropsha A; Rua D; Muratov EN
    Toxicol Sci; 2022 Sep; 189(2):250-259. PubMed ID: 35916740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mutagenicity: QSAR - quasi-QSAR - nano-QSAR.
    Toropova AP; Toropov AA
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2015; 15(8):608-21. PubMed ID: 25694078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.
    Guo Y; Zhao L; Zhang X; Zhu H
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Aug; 178():178-187. PubMed ID: 31004930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Aquatic Narcosis: A Review.
    Adhikari C; Mishra BK
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2018; 14(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 28699497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.