These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980922)

  • 1. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--boon or bane?
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Feb; 3(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 2980922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data bank reporting requirements pose vexing issues.
    Tapay N
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10116425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should due process be part of hospital peer review?
    Segall SE; Pearl W
    South Med J; 1993 Mar; 86(3):368-9. PubMed ID: 8451682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Austin v. McNamara: antitrust immunity for peer review under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Herzog JP; Fisher DR
    Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 10183844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process.
    Hammack JM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adapting to the National Practitioner Data Bank: perspectives for physicians.
    Gagliano RD; Butler DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 10114111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Snelson E
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review.
    Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) protecting peer review from antitrust claims?
    Cross LL
    Healthspan; 1993 Jun; 10(6):11-3. PubMed ID: 10127301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court orders removal of report from National Practitioner Data Bank. Simpkins v. Shalala.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Mar; 16(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10346624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA).
    Wecht CH
    Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical staff credentialing: a prescription for reducing antitrust liability.
    Peters BM; Maneval WC
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):120-33. PubMed ID: 1895761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Professional peer review. Precautions for physicians.
    Struthers MS; Snelson EA
    Minn Med; 1991 Aug; 74(8):27-30. PubMed ID: 1921931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.
    Lovitky JA
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.