These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980939)

  • 1. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Medicolegal issues arising in the emerging mandated health data disclosure era.
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Aug; 3(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 2980939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. Legally permissible uses of mandated health data disclosure.
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Nov; 3(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 2980945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical peer review: the need to organize a protective approach.
    Mills DH
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 10121880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent decision leaves gap in peer review discovery protections. Pagano v. Oroville Hospital.
    Wisch CJ; Penner IE
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MD defames colleague in staff committee meeting.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Sep; 60(9):96,98. PubMed ID: 468199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
    Peterson RN
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy.
    Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review complements QI efforts.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician.
    Curtis T
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
    Stevens M
    Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations.
    Mustes JJ; Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensation and accountability: the way to improve peer review.
    Hershey N
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1603859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The peer review privilege: a dying cause?
    McKinney P
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital peer review systems: an overview.
    Haines S
    Health Matrix; 1984-1985 Winter; 2(4):30-2. PubMed ID: 10272757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wyoming court interprets state peer review shield law.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 May; 6(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10294155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal issues raised by private review activities of medical peer-review organizations.
    Hastings DA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1983; 8(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 6684668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal issues concerning peer review documents.
    Dunn LJ; Holbrook RF
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10252576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box.
    Scott C
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal aspects of the medical staff peer review process. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--boon or bane?
    Couch JB
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 Feb; 3(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 2980922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal issues arising from peer review processes.
    Thomson C
    Aust Health Rev; 1986; 9(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 10279574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.