128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29812944)
1. Quantitative Assessment of Urea In-Solution Lys-C/Trypsin Digestions Reveals Superior Performance at Room Temperature over Traditional Proteolysis at 37 °C.
Betancourt LH; Sanchez A; Pla I; Kuras M; Zhou Q; Andersson R; Marko-Varga G
J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2556-2561. PubMed ID: 29812944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibition of protein carbamylation in urea solution using ammonium-containing buffers.
Sun S; Zhou JY; Yang W; Zhang H
Anal Biochem; 2014 Feb; 446():76-81. PubMed ID: 24161613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem Lys-C/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion.
Glatter T; Ludwig C; Ahrné E; Aebersold R; Heck AJ; Schmidt A
J Proteome Res; 2012 Nov; 11(11):5145-56. PubMed ID: 23017020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Less is More: Membrane Protein Digestion Beyond Urea-Trypsin Solution for Next-level Proteomics.
Zhang X
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2441-53. PubMed ID: 26081834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of In-Solution, FASP, and S-Trap Based Digestion Methods for Bottom-Up Proteomic Studies.
Ludwig KR; Schroll MM; Hummon AB
J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2480-2490. PubMed ID: 29754492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of in-solution digestion efficiency identifies optimal protocols for unbiased protein analysis.
León IR; Schwämmle V; Jensen ON; Sprenger RR
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Oct; 12(10):2992-3005. PubMed ID: 23792921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lys-C/Arg-C, a More Specific and Efficient Digestion Approach for Proteomics Studies.
Wu Z; Huang J; Huang J; Li Q; Zhang X
Anal Chem; 2018 Aug; 90(16):9700-9707. PubMed ID: 30024741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative carbamylation as a stable isotopic labeling method for comparative proteomics.
Angel PM; Orlando R
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2007; 21(10):1623-34. PubMed ID: 17465008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient Tandem LysC/Trypsin Digestion in Detergent Conditions.
Hakobyan A; Schneider MB; Liesack W; Glatter T
Proteomics; 2019 Oct; 19(20):e1900136. PubMed ID: 31536157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation and minimization of nonspecific tryptic cleavages in proteomic sample preparation.
Lin Z; Ren Y; Shi Z; Zhang K; Yang H; Liu S; Hao P
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2020 May; 34(10):e8733. PubMed ID: 32031715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lys-C/Trypsin Tandem-Digestion Protocol for Gel-Free Proteomic Analysis of Colon Biopsies.
Schniers A; Pasing Y; Hansen T
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1959():113-122. PubMed ID: 30852818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quantitative study of the effects of chaotropic agents, surfactants, and solvents on the digestion efficiency of human plasma proteins by trypsin.
Proc JL; Kuzyk MA; Hardie DB; Yang J; Smith DS; Jackson AM; Parker CE; Borchers CH
J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):5422-37. PubMed ID: 20722421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urea free and more efficient sample preparation method for mass spectrometry based protein identification via combining the formic acid-assisted chemical cleavage and trypsin digestion.
Wu S; Yang K; Liang Z; Zhang L; Zhang Y
Talanta; 2011 Oct; 86():429-35. PubMed ID: 22063562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lysine Propionylation To Boost Sequence Coverage and Enable a "Silent SILAC" Strategy for Relative Protein Quantification.
Schräder CU; Moore S; Goodarzi AA; Schriemer DC
Anal Chem; 2018 Aug; 90(15):9077-9084. PubMed ID: 29975514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An aptamer-based trypsin reactor for on-line protein digestion with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.
Xiao P; Lv X; Wang S; Iqbal J; Qing H; Li Q; Deng Y
Anal Biochem; 2013 Oct; 441(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 23831476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecological Monitoring and Omics: A Comprehensive Comparison of Workflows for Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomics of Fish (
Nissa MU; Pinto N; Varshnay A; Goswami M; Srivastava S
OMICS; 2022 Sep; 26(9):489-503. PubMed ID: 36036978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protein carbamylation: in vivo modification or in vitro artefact?
Kollipara L; Zahedi RP
Proteomics; 2013 Mar; 13(6):941-4. PubMed ID: 23335428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating Lys-N proteolysis and N-terminal guanidination for improved fragmentation and relative quantification of singly-charged ions.
Carabetta VJ; Li T; Shakya A; Greco TM; Cristea IM
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2010 Jun; 21(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 20207164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimizing technical variation during sample preparation prior to label-free quantitative mass spectrometry.
Scheerlinck E; Dhaenens M; Van Soom A; Peelman L; De Sutter P; Van Steendam K; Deforce D
Anal Biochem; 2015 Dec; 490():14-9. PubMed ID: 26302362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of mass spectrometry-compatible surfactants for shotgun proteomics.
Chen EI; Cociorva D; Norris JL; Yates JR
J Proteome Res; 2007 Jul; 6(7):2529-38. PubMed ID: 17530876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
