276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29812977)
1. Diagnostic Performance of Monoexponential DWI Versus Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Si Y; Liu RB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):358-368. PubMed ID: 29812977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of mono-exponential DWI versus diffusion kurtosis imaging in breast lesions: A meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Jin Y; Li M; Zhang J; Wang S; Zhang H; Song B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Nov; 101(44):e31574. PubMed ID: 36343063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR diffusion kurtosis imaging for cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative kurtosis value and diffusion coefficient.
Shen L; Zhou G; Tang F; Lin Y; Zhou J; Lv P; Wang Y; Zong G; Zhao J
Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():44-56. PubMed ID: 29908349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study.
Hectors SJ; Semaan S; Song C; Lewis S; Haines GK; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):918-928. PubMed ID: 29117481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MRI for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.
Quentin M; Pentang G; Schimmöller L; Kott O; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Arsov C; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Wittsack HJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):880-5. PubMed ID: 24848289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer.
Park H; Kim SH; Lee Y; Son JH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4235-4243. PubMed ID: 32965517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New RESOLVE-Based Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging in MRI-Visible Prostate Cancer: Effect of Reduced b Value on Image Quality and Diagnostic Effectiveness.
Zhang YD; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Li H; Yan X; Liu XS; Shi HB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Aug; 207(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 27187062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staging liver fibrosis with DWI: is there an added value for diffusion kurtosis imaging?
Yang L; Rao S; Wang W; Chen C; Ding Y; Yang C; Grimm R; Yan X; Fu C; Zeng M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):3041-3049. PubMed ID: 29383522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the liver at 3 Tesla: in vivo comparison to standard diffusion-weighted imaging.
Budjan J; Sauter EA; Zoellner FG; Lemke A; Wambsganss J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jan; 59(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 28454487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion kurtosis imaging of the human kidney: a feasibility study.
Pentang G; Lanzman RS; Heusch P; Müller-Lutz A; Blondin D; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 24582288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion in prostate cancer detection on a 3T scanner: How many b-values are needed?
de Perrot T; Scheffler M; Boto J; Delattre BM; Combescure C; Pusztaszeri M; Tille JC; Iselin C; Vallée JP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):601-9. PubMed ID: 26914964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model.
Jiang Y; Li C; Liu Y; Shi K; Zhang W; Liu M; Chen M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
