These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29843531)

  • 1. A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology.
    Plieninger H; Heck DW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):633-654. PubMed ID: 29843531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian estimation of multinomial processing tree models with heterogeneity in participants and items.
    Matzke D; Dolan CV; Batchelder WH; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychometrika; 2015 Mar; 80(1):205-35. PubMed ID: 24277381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TreeBUGS: An R package for hierarchical multinomial-processing-tree modeling.
    Heck DW; Arnold NR; Arnold D
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):264-284. PubMed ID: 28374146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual Responses to Affirmative and/or Reversed-Worded Items.
    Böckenholt U
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):986-999. PubMed ID: 31512026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heritability of acquiescence bias and item keying response style associated with the HEXACO personality scale.
    Kam C; Schermer JA; Harris J; Vernon PA
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2013 Aug; 16(4):790-8. PubMed ID: 23870678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring Response Styles Across the Big Five: A Multiscale Extension of an Approach Using Multinomial Processing Trees.
    Khorramdel L; von Davier M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014; 49(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 26741175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions.
    Henninger M; Meiser T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):577-595. PubMed ID: 33017167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.
    Batchelder WH; Riefer DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):57-86. PubMed ID: 12199315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
    Böckenholt U; Meiser T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
    Huang HY
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales.
    Tijmstra J; Bolsinova M; Jeon M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2325-2344. PubMed ID: 29322400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration.
    Henninger M; Meiser T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):560-576. PubMed ID: 33017166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.
    Wetzel E; Lüdtke O; Zettler I; Böhnke JR
    Assessment; 2016 Jun; 23(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 25986062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence.
    Primi R; Santos D; De Fruyt F; John OP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):447-465. PubMed ID: 31032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A General Unfolding IRT Model for Multiple Response Styles.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):195-210. PubMed ID: 31019356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reversed item bias: an integrative model.
    Weijters B; Baumgartner H; Schillewaert N
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):320-34. PubMed ID: 23646990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales.
    Park M; Wu AD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):911-930. PubMed ID: 31488919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The stability of individual response styles.
    Weijters B; Geuens M; Schillewaert N
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Mar; 15(1):96-110. PubMed ID: 20230106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling Changes in Response Style with Longitudinal IRTree Models.
    Ames AJ; Leventhal BC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):859-878. PubMed ID: 34061692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.