BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29843694)

  • 1. Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.
    Washino S; Kobayashi S; Okochi T; Kameda T; Konoshi T; Miyagawa T; Takayama T; Morita T
    BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29843694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Boxler S; Kuru TH; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Steinemann S; Huettenbrink C; Bergstraesser-Gasch C; Klein T; Kesch C; Roethke M; Becker N; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Sep; 18(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26078202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
    Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.
    Monni F; Fontanella P; Grasso A; Wiklund P; Ou YC; Randazzo M; Rocco B; Montanari E; Bianchi G
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 28488844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
    Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
    Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying the PRECISION approach in biopsy naïve and previously negative prostate biopsy patients.
    Wang NN; Teslovich NC; Fan RE; Ghanouni P; Leppert JT; Brooks JD; Ahmadi S; Sonn GA
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):530.e19-530.e24. PubMed ID: 31151788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Bonekamp D; Freitag MT; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Hatiboglu G; Boxler S; Pahernik S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27184812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between TRUS-Guided Biopsy and MRI-Targeted Biopsy According to PSA Level in Biopsy-Naive Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Choi YH; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeon HG; Chang Jeong B; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Kim CK; Park BK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Feb; 17(1):e19-e25. PubMed ID: 30415878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved detection and reduced biopsies: the effect of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based triage prostate cancer pathway in a public teaching hospital.
    Donato P; Morton A; Yaxley J; Teloken PE; Coughlin G; Esler R; Dunglison N; Gardiner RA; Roberts MJ
    World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 31055625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
    Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
    Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
    Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Kajtazovic A; Lodeizen OAP; Gayet M; Engelbrecht MRW; Jager GJ; Wijkstra H; de Reijke TM; Beerlage HP
    Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 37(5):298.e1-298.e9. PubMed ID: 30660493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
    Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of significant tumor in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
    Abdi H; Pourmalek F; Zargar H; Walshe T; Harris AC; Chang SD; Eddy C; So AI; Gleave ME; Machan L; Goldenberg SL; Black PC
    Urology; 2015 Feb; 85(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 25623709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.