641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29843694)
21. [Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy].
Kesch C; Radtke JP; Distler F; Boxler S; Klein T; Hüttenbrink C; Hees K; Roth W; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Urologe A; 2016 Aug; 55(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 27168038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical significance of prostate cancer identified by transperineal standard template biopsy in men with nonsuspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Dahl DM; Wu S; Lin SX; Hu M; Barney AA; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 42(2):28.e21-28.e28. PubMed ID: 38182499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy.
Stejskal J; Adamcová V; Záleský M; Novák V; Čapoun O; Fiala V; Dolejšová O; Sedláčková H; Veselý Š; Zachoval R
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 32761380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In-gantry MRI guided prostate biopsy diagnosis of prostatitis and its relationship with PIRADS V.2 based score.
Jyoti R; Jina NH; Haxhimolla HZ
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 61(2):212-215. PubMed ID: 27987276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
Delongchamps NB; Portalez D; Bruguière E; Rouvière O; Malavaud B; Mozer P; Fiard G; Cornud F;
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 27079582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL.
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Dwivedi AK; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 28872226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway.
Wiemer L; Hollenbach M; Heckmann R; Kittner B; Plage H; Reimann M; Asbach P; Friedersdorff F; Schlomm T; Hofbauer S; Cash H
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 32654967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Utilization trend of prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on prostate cancer detection: Real-world insights from a high-volume center in southwest China.
Zhang C; Tu X; Dai J; Zhang Z; Shen C; Wu Q; Liu Z; Lin T; Qiu S; Yang L; Yang L; Zhang M; Cai D; Bao Y; Zeng H; Wei Q
Prostate; 2024 May; 84(6):539-548. PubMed ID: 38173301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy.
Lee AYM; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WKO; Lee LS; Ho HSS; Tay KJ; Cheng CWS; Yuen JSP; Chen K
BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 32438463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Histology core-specific evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardised scoring system of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Rieker P; Roth W; Fenchel M; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Hadaschik BA
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23937255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A prospective study investigating the impact of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naïve patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: The PROKOMB study.
Baur ADJ; Henkel T; Johannsen M; Speck T; Weißbach L; Hamm B; König F
Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 May; 56():46-51. PubMed ID: 28279782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cognitive versus Software-Assisted Registration: Development of a New Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer at MRI-Targeted Biopsies.
Kaufmann S; Russo GI; Thaiss W; Notohamiprodjo M; Bamberg F; Bedke J; Morgia G; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Kruck S
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e953-e960. PubMed ID: 29685613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions.
Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies.
Filson CP; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Lieu P; Dorey FJ; Reiter RE; Marks LS
Cancer; 2016 Mar; 122(6):884-92. PubMed ID: 26749141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
