These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29844313)

  • 1. Inharmonic speech reveals the role of harmonicity in the cocktail party problem.
    Popham S; Boebinger D; Ellis DPW; Kawahara H; McDermott JH
    Nat Commun; 2018 May; 9(1):2122. PubMed ID: 29844313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1747. PubMed ID: 27106322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.
    Bronkhorst AW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1465-87. PubMed ID: 25828463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.
    Schwartz A; McDermott JH; Shinn-Cunningham B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):357-68. PubMed ID: 22779483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Litovsky RY
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monaural speech segregation using synthetic speech signals.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2327-33. PubMed ID: 16642846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation.
    Grossberg S; Govindarajan KK; Wyse LL; Cohen MA
    Neural Netw; 2004 May; 17(4):511-36. PubMed ID: 15109681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 361():92-102. PubMed ID: 29398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No evidence for a benefit from masker harmonicity in the perception of speech in noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Feb; 153(2):1064. PubMed ID: 36859153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovering sound sources from embedded repetition.
    McDermott JH; Wrobleski D; Oxenham AJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jan; 108(3):1188-93. PubMed ID: 21199948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formant-frequency variation and its effects on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():323-31. PubMed ID: 23716238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF; Mansell ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.