135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29844518)
1. PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation.
Witte AK; Mester P; Fister S; Süß B; Wagner M; Rossmanith P
Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):8275. PubMed ID: 29844518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pairwise efficiency: a new mathematical approach to qPCR data analysis increases the precision of the calibration curve assay.
Panina Y; Germond A; David BG; Watanabe TM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 31146686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a duplex real-time PCR assay for the diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis.
Lobanov VA; Peckle M; Massard CL; Brad Scandrett W; Gajadhar AA
Parasit Vectors; 2018 Mar; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 29499748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultra-fast, sensitive and quantitative on-chip detection of group B streptococci in clinical samples.
Cai Q; Fauvart M; Wiederkehr RS; Jones B; Cools P; Goos P; Vaneechoutte M; Stakenborg T
Talanta; 2019 Jan; 192():220-225. PubMed ID: 30348381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Keeping up with advances in qPCR pathogen detection: an example for QPX disease in hard clams.
Geraci-Yee S; Allam B; Collier JL
Dis Aquat Organ; 2022 Mar; 148():127-144. PubMed ID: 35356896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of a multiplex reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay for the rapid detection of Citrus tristeza virus, Citrus psorosis virus, and Citrus leaf blotch virus.
Osman F; Hodzic E; Kwon SJ; Wang J; Vidalakis G
J Virol Methods; 2015 Aug; 220():64-75. PubMed ID: 25907469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of high-throughput real time polymerase chain reaction assays for simultaneous detection of invasive citrus pathogens.
Saponari M; Loconsole G; Liao HH; Jiang B; Savino V; Yokomi RK
J Virol Methods; 2013 Nov; 193(2):478-86. PubMed ID: 23891873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel data processing method CyC* for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction minimizes cumulative error.
Zhang L; Dong R; Wei S; Zhou HC; Zhang MX; Alagarsamy K
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218159. PubMed ID: 31185064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration-free assays on standard real-time PCR devices.
Debski PR; Gewartowski K; Bajer S; Garstecki P
Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():44854. PubMed ID: 28327545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of real-time reverse transcriptase qPCR assays for the detection of Punta Toro virus and Pichinde virus.
Stefan CP; Chase K; Coyne S; Kulesh DA; Minogue TD; Koehler JW
Virol J; 2016 Mar; 13():54. PubMed ID: 27029488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of a multiplex quantitative PCR assay for the rapid detection of Grapevine virus A, B and D.
Osman F; Hodzic E; Omanska-Klusek A; Olineka T; Rowhani A
J Virol Methods; 2013 Dec; 194(1-2):138-45. PubMed ID: 23973785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colonization patterns of Enterococcus cecorum in two different broiler production cycles detected with a newly developed quantitative real-time PCR.
Jung A; Petersen H; Teske L; Rautenschlein S
BMC Microbiol; 2017 May; 17(1):106. PubMed ID: 28476097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of primers and probes for quantitative real-time PCR methods.
Rodríguez A; Rodríguez M; Córdoba JJ; Andrade MJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1275():31-56. PubMed ID: 25697650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multiplex real-time PCR assay, based on invA and pagC genes, for the detection and quantification of Salmonella enterica from cattle lymph nodes.
Bai J; Trinetta V; Shi X; Noll LW; Magossi G; Zheng W; Porter EP; Cernicchiaro N; Renter DG; Nagaraja TG
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 May; 148():110-116. PubMed ID: 29621581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Essential role of polymerases for assay performance - Impact of polymerase replacement in a well-established assay.
Witte AK; Sickha R; Mester P; Fister S; Schoder D; Rossmanith P
Biomol Detect Quantif; 2018 Dec; 16():12-20. PubMed ID: 30560063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PCRdrive: the largest qPCR assay archive to date and endless potential for lab workflow revitalization.
Burger F; Angioni M; Russo G; Schad M; Kallarackal J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):447. PubMed ID: 30466398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial validation of a TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of ranaviruses.
Stilwell NK; Whittington RJ; Hick PM; Becker JA; Ariel E; van Beurden S; Vendramin N; Olesen NJ; Waltzek TB
Dis Aquat Organ; 2018 May; 128(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 29733025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification bias caused by plasmid DNA conformation in quantitative real-time PCR assay.
Lin CH; Chen YC; Pan TM
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29101. PubMed ID: 22194997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular diagnostic toolkit for Rhizophagus irregularis isolate DAOM-197198 using quantitative PCR assay targeting the mitochondrial genome.
Badri A; Stefani FO; Lachance G; Roy-Arcand L; Beaudet D; Vialle A; Hijri M
Mycorrhiza; 2016 Oct; 26(7):721-33. PubMed ID: 27220880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Filtering maxRatio results with machine learning models increases quantitative PCR accuracy over the fit point method.
Marongiu L; Shain E; Shain K; Allgayer H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Feb; 169():105803. PubMed ID: 31809831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
