These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29844978)

  • 1. Effects of preservation method on canine (
    Horng KR; Ganz HH; Eisen JA; Marks SL
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4827. PubMed ID: 29844978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
    Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
    Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.
    Mordant A; Kleiner M
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.
    Barko P; Nguyen-Edquilang J; Williams DA; Gal A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0294730. PubMed ID: 38324560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
    Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
    Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of fecal bacterial viability and diversity in fresh and frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) product in horses.
    Long AE; Pitta D; Hennessy M; Indugu N; Vecchiarelli B; Luethy D; Aceto H; Hurcombe S
    BMC Vet Res; 2024 Jul; 20(1):306. PubMed ID: 38987780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.
    Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of different storage methods to characterize the fecal bacterial communities of captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).
    Vlčková K; Mrázek J; Kopečný J; Petrželková KJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct; 91(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 22828127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
    Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative methods for fecal sample storage to preserve gut microbial structure and function in an in vitro model of the human colon.
    Deschamps C; Fournier E; Uriot O; Lajoie F; Verdier C; Comtet-Marre S; Thomas M; Kapel N; Cherbuy C; Alric M; Almeida M; Etienne-Mesmin L; Blanquet-Diot S
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 104(23):10233-10247. PubMed ID: 33085024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
    Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.
    Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Sinha R
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28258145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
    Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota.
    Hale VL; Tan CL; Niu K; Yang Y; Cui D; Zhao H; Knight R; Amato KR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():180-188. PubMed ID: 27686380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
    Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
    mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
    Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples.
    Kim JH; Jeon JY; Im YJ; Ha N; Kim JK; Moon SJ; Kim MG
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):114. PubMed ID: 36596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.