These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29845319)

  • 1. Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Langenauer J; Betschart P; Hechelhammer L; Güsewell S; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Abt D; Zumstein V
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2073-2080. PubMed ID: 29845319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Yamashita S; Kohjimoto Y; Iguchi T; Nishizawa S; Iba A; Kikkawa K; Hara I
    J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(4):384-390. PubMed ID: 28052698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.
    Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD
    J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External Validation of Triple D Score in an Elderly (≥65 Years) Population for Prediction of Success Following Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Gökce MI; Esen B; Gülpınar B; Süer E; Gülpınar Ö
    J Endourol; 2016 Sep; 30(9):1009-16. PubMed ID: 27392789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variables measured on three-dimensional computed tomography are preferred for predicting the outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kobayashi M; Waseda Y; Fuse H; Takazawa R
    World J Urol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):569-575. PubMed ID: 34687343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.
    Hameed DA; Elgammal MA; ElGanainy EO; Hageb A; Mohammed K; El-Taher AM; Mostafa MM; Ahmed AI
    Urolithiasis; 2013 Nov; 41(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 23907170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.
    Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M
    World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do we really need kidneys-ureters-bladder radiography to predict stone radiopacity before treatment with shockwave lithotripsy? Development and internal validation of a novel predictive model based on computed tomography parameters.
    Sfoungaristos S; Hidas G; Gofrit ON; Yutkin V; Latke A; Landau EH; Pode D; Duvdevani M
    J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 25945651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?
    Xun Y; Li J; Geng Y; Liu Z; Yu X; Wang X; Xiao F; Li Z; Li C; Wang S
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():84-89. PubMed ID: 30292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
    Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.
    Geng JH; Tu HP; Shih PM; Shen JT; Jang MY; Wu WJ; Li CC; Chou YH; Juan YS
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 31(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25600918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.
    El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Mansour O; Sheir KZ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. PubMed ID: 17161522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
    Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases.
    Yamashita S; Kohjimoto Y; Iwahashi Y; Iguchi T; Nishizawa S; Kikkawa K; Hara I
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9253952. PubMed ID: 30627582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.