These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29845319)

  • 21. External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Triple D Score to Predict Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Ozgor F; Tosun M; Kayali Y; Savun M; Binbay M; Tepeler A
    J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 27889982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.
    Sugino Y; Kato T; Furuya S; Sasaki T; Arima K; Sugimura Y
    Urolithiasis; 2020 Feb; 48(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 30859262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance.
    Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.
    Lee JY; Kim JH; Kang DH; Chung DY; Lee DH; Do Jung H; Kwon JK; Cho KS
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23988. PubMed ID: 27035621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abdominal fat distribution on computed tomography predicts ureteric calculus fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
    Juan HC; Lin HY; Chou YH; Yang YH; Shih PM; Chuang SM; Shen JT; Juan YS
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1624-30. PubMed ID: 22415413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Triple D Score is a reportable predictor of shockwave lithotripsy stone-free rates.
    Tran TY; McGillen K; Cone EB; Pareek G
    J Endourol; 2015 Feb; 29(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 25046472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and validation of a prediction model for failed shockwave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi using computed tomography information: the S
    Yoshioka T; Ikenoue T; Hashimoto H; Otsuki H; Oeda T; Ishito N; Watanabe R; Saika T; Araki M; Fukuhara S; Yamamoto Y;
    World J Urol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):3267-3273. PubMed ID: 32088747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is measurement of stone surface area necessary for SWL treatment of nonstaghorn calculi?
    Buchholz NP; Rhabar MH; Talati J
    J Endourol; 2002 May; 16(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 12042102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcome groups and a practical tool to predict success of shock wave lithotripsy in daily clinical routine.
    Hirsch B; Abt D; Güsewell S; Langenauer J; Betschart P; Pratsinis M; Vetterlein MW; Schmid HP; Wildermuth S; Zumstein V
    World J Urol; 2021 Mar; 39(3):943-951. PubMed ID: 32436072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Ng CF; Siu DY; Wong A; Goggins W; Chan ES; Wong KT
    J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1151-7. PubMed ID: 19152949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.
    Gupta NP; Ansari MS; Kesarvani P; Kapoor A; Mukhopadhyay S
    BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1285-8. PubMed ID: 15892818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors.
    Yazici O; Tuncer M; Sahin C; Demirkol MK; Kafkasli A; Sarica K
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26401859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand.
    Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW
    J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):655-659. PubMed ID: 30963786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
    Perks AE; Schuler TD; Lee J; Ghiculete D; Chung DG; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 18674803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
    Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.
    Bigum LH; Ulriksen PS; Omar OS
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 26914829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
    Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preoperative stone attenuation value predicts success after shock wave lithotripsy in children.
    McAdams S; Kim N; Dajusta D; Monga M; Ravish IR; Nerli R; Baker L; Shukla AR
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4 Suppl):1804-9. PubMed ID: 20728112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.