407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29845403)
1. Applications of Advanced Breast Imaging Modalities.
Alzaghal AA; DiPiro PJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2018 May; 20(7):57. PubMed ID: 29845403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.
Lobig F; Caleyachetty A; Forrester L; Morris E; Newstead G; Harris J; Blankenburg M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(5):478-490. PubMed ID: 37202338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.
Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast density implications and supplemental screening.
Vourtsis A; Berg WA
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1762-1777. PubMed ID: 30255244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personalised screening: is this the way forward?
Gilbert FJ; Selamoglu A
Clin Radiol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):327-333. PubMed ID: 29273223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for Breast Cancer.
Niell BL; Freer PE; Weinfurtner RJ; Arleo EK; Drukteinis JS
Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 Nov; 55(6):1145-1162. PubMed ID: 28991557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of Adjunctive Imaging Modalities Compared to Mammography Alone in Women with Non-Dense and Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hadadi I; Rae W; Clarke J; McEntee M; Ekpo E
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):278-291. PubMed ID: 33846098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
Skaane P
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 27259342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?
Chetlen A; Mack J; Chan T
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 26093511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
