These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29845873)

  • 1. Seven-Year Clinical Surveillance Program Demonstrates Consistent MARD Accuracy Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Grady M; Mackintosh S; Donald R; Levy B
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 29845873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product.
    Setford S; Grady M; Phillips S; Miller L; Mackintosh S; Cameron H; Corrigall K
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28406040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Quantitative Relationship Between ISO 15197 Accuracy Criteria and Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) in the Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Systems.
    Pardo S; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 10(5):1182-7. PubMed ID: 27118729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-Market Surveillance Assessment of the Clinical Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System with an Improved Algorithm for Enhanced Product Performance.
    Setford S; Liu Z; McColl D; Phillips S; Cameron H; Grady M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 17(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 34463143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significance and Reliability of MARD for the Accuracy of CGM Systems.
    Reiterer F; Polterauer P; Schoemaker M; Schmelzeisen-Redecker G; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 27566735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Petruschke T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Calibrated With Capillary Values Using Capillary or Venous Glucose Levels as a Reference.
    Andelin M; Kropff J; Matuleviciene V; Joseph JI; Attvall S; Theodorsson E; Hirsch IB; Imberg H; Dahlqvist S; Klonoff D; Haraldsson B; DeVries JH; Lind M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 26810924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked Glucometer System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Hehmke B; Berg S; Salzsieder E
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):635-636. PubMed ID: 27707915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance Comparison of CGM Systems: MARD Values Are Not Always a Reliable Indicator of CGM System Accuracy.
    Kirchsteiger H; Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Lodwig V; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 9(5):1030-40. PubMed ID: 26330485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.
    Halldorsdottir S; Warchal-Windham ME; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 7(5):1294-304. PubMed ID: 24124957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mean Absolute Relative Difference of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Relationship to ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Mende J; Pleus S; Waldenmaier D; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Sep; 16(5):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 33759584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
    Wadwa RP; Laffel LM; Shah VN; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 29901421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring.
    Kovatchev BP; Patek SD; Ortiz EA; Breton MD
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 25436913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance evaluations of continuous glucose monitoring systems: precision absolute relative deviation is part of the assessment.
    Obermaier K; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Schoemaker M; Klötzer HM; Kirchsteiger H; Eikmeier H; del Re L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 23911163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain.
    Bedini JL; Wallace JF; Petruschke T; Pardo S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 10(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 26253142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator.
    Shah VN; Laffel LM; Wadwa RP; Garg SK
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):428-433. PubMed ID: 29923775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
    Laffel L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence From a Long-Term, Systematic Post-Market Surveillance Program: Clinical Performance of a Hematocrit-Insensitive Blood Glucose Test Strip.
    Setford S; Phillips S; Grady M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 15(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 30730221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.