These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29846003)

  • 1. Comparison of Syringe Compression Force Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.
    Mundi MS; Duellman W; Epp L; Davidson J; Hurt RT
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2019 Jan; 43(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 29846003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Gravity Flow Rates Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.
    Mundi MS; Duellman W; Epp L; Davidson J; Hurt RT
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2018 Mar; 42(3):522-528. PubMed ID: 28406738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased Force Required With Proposed Standardized Enteral Feed Connector in Blenderized Tube Feeding.
    Mundi MS; Epp L; Hurt RT
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):795-798. PubMed ID: 27091746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Design Changes in Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube) Devices for Patients Who Rely on Home-Based Blenderized Diets for Enteral Nutrition.
    Guha S; Bouhrira N; Antonino MJ; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2019; 38(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 30821589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In Vitro Performance Testing of Legacy and ENFit Gastrostomy Tube Devices Under Gravity Flow Conditions.
    Guha S; Ravi N; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2018 Nov; 42(8):1334-1341. PubMed ID: 29701924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gravity Flow in Proposed Enteral Tube Small-Bore Connectors.
    Hurt RT; Epp LM; Pattinson AK; Duellman WM; Corner SM; Mundi MS
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 27913774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthesis of research on ENFit gastrostomy tubes with potential implications for US patients using these devices.
    Guha S; Herman A; Antonino M; Silverstein JS; Venkataraman-Rao P; Myers MR
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2022 Aug; 37(4):752-761. PubMed ID: 35165940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility of International Proposed Standardized Enteral Connector for Semi-Solid Formula Feeding.
    Maruyama M; Iijima S; Ishibashi N; Inukai M; Oriishi T; Kawasaki N; Kurata N; Suzuki Y; Tabei I; Chiba M; Nakamura E; Higashiguchi T
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2018; 73(3):169-176. PubMed ID: 30179861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing dosing errors in legacy and low dose tip ENFit
    Guha S; Niswander W; Herman A; Antonino MJ; Venkataraman Rao P; White K; Haugen S; Vesnovsky O
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2022 Feb; 47(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34713903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ENFit Enteral Nutrition Connectors.
    Guenter P; Lyman B
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):769-772. PubMed ID: 27756849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosing inaccuracy with enteral use of ENFit ® low-dose tip syringes: The risk beyond oral adapters.
    O'Mara K; Campbell C
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2020 Apr; 45(2):335-339. PubMed ID: 31755574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasogastric tube feeding--which syringe size produces lower pressure and is safest to use?
    Knox T; Davie J
    Nurs Times; 2009 Jul 14-20; 105(27):24-6. PubMed ID: 19736831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of feeding-tube properties on residual volume measurements in tube-fed patients.
    Metheny NA; Stewart J; Nuetzel G; Oliver D; Clouse RE
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2005; 29(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 15837779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-sectional Evaluation of Home Enteral Nutrition Practice in the United States in the Context of the New Enteral Connectors.
    Epp LM; Salonen BR; Hurt RT; Mundi MS
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2019 Nov; 43(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 30729551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing Delivery of Breast Milk for Premature Infants: Comparison of Current Enteral Feeding Systems.
    Abdelrahman K; Jarjour J; Hagan J; Yang H; Sutton D; Hair A
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 35(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 31713294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small-bore feeding tube versus large-bore sump tube for early enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients: A nationwide inpatient database study.
    Ohbe H; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H
    Clin Nutr; 2021 Jun; 40(6):4113-4119. PubMed ID: 33610423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Declogging small-bore feeding tubes.
    Nicholson LJ
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1987; 11(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 3123731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical considerations for medical device manufacturers when designing gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) using the new ISO 80369-3 connector.
    Guha S; Herman A; Herbertson L; Antonino MJ; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236644. PubMed ID: 32730360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing patient safety in enteral feeding.
    Holland M
    Nurs Times; 2015 Sep 16-22; 111(38):22-3. PubMed ID: 26513986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blenderized tube feedings: Practice recommendations from the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.
    Epp L; Blackmer A; Church A; Ford I; Grenda B; Larimer C; Lewis-Ayalloore J; Malone A; Pataki L; Rempel G; Washington V;
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2023 Dec; 38(6):1190-1219. PubMed ID: 37787762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.