246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29847783)
1. Effects of alternative energy sources on bacterial cellulose characteristics produced by Komagataeibacter medellinensis.
Molina-Ramírez C; Enciso C; Torres-Taborda M; Zuluaga R; Gañán P; Rojas OJ; Castro C
Int J Biol Macromol; 2018 Oct; 117():735-741. PubMed ID: 29847783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Production of nano bacterial cellulose from beverage industrial waste of citrus peel and pomace using Komagataeibacter xylinus.
Fan X; Gao Y; He W; Hu H; Tian M; Wang K; Pan S
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():1068-1072. PubMed ID: 27474656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fruit peels support higher yield and superior quality bacterial cellulose production.
Kumbhar JV; Rajwade JM; Paknikar KM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Aug; 99(16):6677-91. PubMed ID: 25957154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolation and identification of cellulose-producing strain Komagataeibacter intermedius from fermented fruit juice.
Lin SP; Huang YH; Hsu KD; Lai YJ; Chen YK; Cheng KC
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 151():827-833. PubMed ID: 27474630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Production of high crystallinity type-I cellulose from Komagataeibacter hansenii JR-02 isolated from Kombucha tea.
Li J; Chen G; Zhang R; Wu H; Zeng W; Liang Z
Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2019 Jan; 66(1):108-118. PubMed ID: 30359481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Komagataeibacter rhaeticus as an alternative bacteria for cellulose production.
Machado RTA; Gutierrez J; Tercjak A; Trovatti E; Uahib FGM; Moreno GP; Nascimento AP; Berreta AA; Ribeiro SJL; Barud HS
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Nov; 152():841-849. PubMed ID: 27516336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterisation of films and nanopaper obtained from cellulose synthesised by acetic acid bacteria.
Rozenberga L; Skute M; Belkova L; Sable I; Vikele L; Semjonovs P; Saka M; Ruklisha M; Paegle L
Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Jun; 144():33-40. PubMed ID: 27083790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphology and structure characterization of bacterial celluloses produced by different strains in agitated culture.
Bi JC; Liu SX; Li CF; Li J; Liu LX; Deng J; Yang YC
J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Nov; 117(5):1305-11. PubMed ID: 25098972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium.
Barshan S; Rezazadeh-Bari M; Almasi H; Amiri S
Int J Biol Macromol; 2019 Sep; 136():1188-1195. PubMed ID: 31252013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical optimization and characterization of a biocellulose produced by local Egyptian isolate Komagataeibacter hansenii AS.5.
Saleh AK; Soliman NA; Farrag AA; Ibrahim MM; El-Shinnawy NA; Abdel-Fattah YR
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Feb; 144():198-207. PubMed ID: 31843613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Different Carbon Sources on Bacterial Nanocellulose Production and Structure Using the Low pH Resistant Strain Komagataeibacter Medellinensis.
Molina-Ramírez C; Castro M; Osorio M; Torres-Taborda M; Gómez B; Zuluaga R; Gómez C; Gañán P; Rojas OJ; Castro C
Materials (Basel); 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28773001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from fruit and vegetable peels by Komagataeibacter hansenii GA2016.
Güzel M; Akpınar Ö
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Nov; 162():1597-1604. PubMed ID: 32777420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coproduction of bacterial cellulose and pear vinegar by fermentation of pear peel and pomace.
Ma X; Yuan H; Wang H; Yu H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2021 Nov; 44(11):2231-2244. PubMed ID: 34165619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Production of bacterial cellulose from Komagataeibacter saccharivorans strain BC1 isolated from rotten green grapes.
Gopu G; Govindan S
Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2018; 48(9):842-852. PubMed ID: 30303756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of cellulose nanocrystal addition on the production and characterization of bacterial nanocellulose.
Bang WY; Adedeji OE; Kang HJ; Kang MD; Yang J; Lim YW; Jung YH
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Dec; 193(Pt A):269-275. PubMed ID: 34695495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Production efficiency and properties of bacterial cellulose membranes in a novel grape pomace hydrolysate by Komagataeibacter melomenusus AV436
Gorgieva S; Jančič U; Cepec E; Trček J
Int J Biol Macromol; 2023 Jul; 244():125368. PubMed ID: 37330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of pH Buffer and Carbon Metabolism on the Yield and Mechanical Properties of Bacterial Cellulose Produced by
Li Z; Chen SQ; Cao X; Li L; Zhu J; Yu H
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):429-438. PubMed ID: 33323677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacterial Cellulose Production from agricultural Residues by two
Akintunde MO; Adebayo-Tayo BC; Ishola MM; Zamani A; Horváth IS
Bioengineered; 2022 Apr; 13(4):10010-10025. PubMed ID: 35416127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Gomes RJ; de Sousa Faria-Tischer PC; Tischer CA; Constantino LV; de Freitas Rosa M; Chideroli RT; de Pádua Pereira U; Spinosa WA
Food Technol Biotechnol; 2021 Dec; 59(4):432-442. PubMed ID: 35136368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutation-based selection and analysis of Komagataeibacter hansenii HDM1-3 for improvement in bacterial cellulose production.
Li Y; Tian J; Tian H; Chen X; Ping W; Tian C; Lei H
J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 121(5):1323-1334. PubMed ID: 27455093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
