These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29847981)

  • 1. A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect.
    Janczyk M; Lerche V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Feb; 148(2):237-251. PubMed ID: 29847981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Action effects are coded as transitions from current to future stimulation: Evidence from compatibility effects in tracking.
    Kunde W; Schmidts C; Wirth R; Herbort O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):477-486. PubMed ID: 27893272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From anticipation to integration: the role of integrated action-effects in building sensorimotor contingencies.
    Camus T; Hommel B; Brunel L; Brouillet T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 28537007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separating the effects of stimulus-gravity compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on visuomotor synchronization.
    Zhou L; Shangguan M; Xing L; Yu H; Wang H; Hove MJ; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):405-415. PubMed ID: 32223292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating grounded conceptualization: Stimulus-response compatibility for tool handles is due to spatial attention.
    Matheson HE; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):441-457. PubMed ID: 30816789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of subliminal effect images in voluntary vs. stimulus-driven actions.
    Le Bars S; Hsu YF; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():6-15. PubMed ID: 27467892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the representational basis of response-effect compatibility: Evidence from bilingual verbal response-effect mappings.
    Földes N; Philipp AM; Badets A; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():1-7. PubMed ID: 29631041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acting and anticipating: Impact of outcome-compatible distractor depends on response selection efficiency.
    Gozli DG; Huffman G; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1601-14. PubMed ID: 27280711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action-effect anticipation and temporal adaptation in social interactions.
    Lelonkiewicz JR; Gambi C; Weller L; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):335-349. PubMed ID: 32223288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interplay of predictive and postdictive components of experienced selfhood.
    Liesner M; Kirsch W; Kunde W
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102850. PubMed ID: 31731032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Action selection by temporally distal goal states.
    Janczyk M; Durst M; Ulrich R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):467-473. PubMed ID: 27325055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.
    Janczyk M; Xiong A; Proctor RW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1297-1314. PubMed ID: 30844314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck.
    Wirth R; Pfister R; Janczyk M; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():141-51. PubMed ID: 26247333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sociomotor actions: Anticipated partner responses are primarily represented in terms of spatial, not anatomical features.
    Weller L; Pfister R; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1104-1118. PubMed ID: 31135168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect-based action control with body-related effects: Implications for empirical approaches to ideomotor action control.
    Pfister R
    Psychol Rev; 2019 Jan; 126(1):153-161. PubMed ID: 30604990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear engagement of action observation network underlying action anticipation in players with different levels of expertise.
    Chen YH; Chang CY; Huang SK; Yen NS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(18):5199-5214. PubMed ID: 32845066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial perspective taking mediated by whole-body motor simulation.
    Muto H; Matsushita S; Morikawa K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):337-355. PubMed ID: 28795837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What or when? The impact of anticipated social action effects is driven by action-effect compatibility, not delay.
    Pfister R; Weller L; Dignath D; Kunde W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2132-2142. PubMed ID: 28688096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action-effect contingency modulates the readiness potential.
    Vercillo T; O'Neil S; Jiang F
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():273-279. PubMed ID: 30114465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The kinematics that you do not expect: Integrating prior information and kinematics to understand intentions.
    Koul A; Soriano M; Tversky B; Becchio C; Cavallo A
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():213-219. PubMed ID: 30347321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.