BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29848018)

  • 1. Image quality comparison of two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR, ASiR-V) algorithms and filtered back projection in routine liver CT.
    Chen LH; Jin C; Li JY; Wang GL; Jia YJ; Duan HF; Pan N; Guo J
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1088):20170655. PubMed ID: 29848018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V With Combination of 80 kV for Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in Renal Computed Tomography Angiography for Slim Patients.
    Ren Z; Zhang X; Hu Z; Li D; Liu Z; Wei D; Jia Y; Yu N; Yu Y; Lei Y; Chen X; Guo C; Ren Z; He T
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):e324-e332. PubMed ID: 30655053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed Tomography Image Quality Evaluation of a New Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in the Abdomen (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V) a Comparison With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection Reconstructions.
    Goodenberger MH; Wagner-Bartak NA; Gupta S; Liu X; Yap RQ; Sun J; Tamm EP; Jensen CT
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 28806318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality improvement using model-based iterative reconstruction in low dose chest CT for children with necrotizing pneumonia.
    Sun J; Yu T; Liu J; Duan X; Hu D; Liu Y; Peng Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Mar; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28302073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of noise reduction potential and image quality improvement of a new generation adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) in chest CT.
    Tang H; Yu N; Jia Y; Yu Y; Duan H; Han D; Ma G; Ren C; He T
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 91(1081):20170521. PubMed ID: 29076347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of applied dose and image quality in staging CT of neuroendocrine tumor patients using standard filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Böning G; Schäfer M; Grupp U; Kaul D; Kahn J; Pavel M; Maurer M; Denecke T; Hamm B; Streitparth F
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 25963505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of two iterative reconstruction algorithms, MBIR and ASIR, in low radiation dose and low contrast dose abdominal CT in children.
    Sun J; Yang L; Zhou Z; Zhang D; Han W; Zhang Q; Peng Y
    Radiol Med; 2020 Oct; 125(10):918-925. PubMed ID: 32319005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
    Vachha B; Brodoefel H; Wilcox C; Hackney DB; Moonis G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2222-6. PubMed ID: 24016832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in CT Portal Venography Using 80 kV and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V in Slender Patients.
    Ren Z; Zhang X; Hu Z; Li D; Liu Z; Wei D; Jia Y; Yu N; Yu Y; Lei Y; Chen X; Guo C; Ren Z; He T
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):233-243. PubMed ID: 31031186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction veo and 80 kv in renal computed tomography angiography].
    Ren ZL; Hu ZJ; Li D; Jia YJ; Yu N; Yu Y; Guo CY; Zhang XR; He TP
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 99(25):1953-1958. PubMed ID: 31269599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Prakash P; Kalra MK; Kambadakone AK; Pien H; Hsieh J; Blake MA; Sahani DV
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Apr; 45(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 20177389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.