These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29848201)

  • 21. Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.
    Lansbergen S; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1619-1634. PubMed ID: 33136637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Technical and audiological factors in the implementation and use of digital signal processing hearing aids.
    Naylor G
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 9428031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consensus on Hearing Aid Candidature and Fitting for Mild Hearing Loss, With and Without Tinnitus: Delphi Review.
    Sereda M; Hoare DJ; Nicholson R; Smith S; Hall DA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):417-29. PubMed ID: 25587668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Real-Life Benefit From Hearing-Aid Noise Management: SSQ12 Questionnaire Versus Ecological Momentary Assessment With Acoustic Data-Logging.
    Andersson KE; Andersen LS; Christensen JH; Neher T
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 30(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 33375840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Common Sound Scenarios: A Context-Driven Categorization of Everyday Sound Environments for Application in Hearing-Device Research.
    Wolters F; Smeds K; Schmidt E; Christensen EK; Norup C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):527-40. PubMed ID: 27406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hearing aid fitting procedures--state-of-the-art and current issues.
    Kiessling J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):57-9. PubMed ID: 11318484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fitting Noise Management Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Verification Protocols.
    Scollie S; Levy C; Pourmand N; Abbasalipour P; Bagatto M; Richert F; Moodie S; Crukley J; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 26967364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors Associated With Successful Setup of a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid and the Need for Personalized Support.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Hickson L; Meyer C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):794-804. PubMed ID: 30285978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recording and classification of the acoustic environment of hearing aid users.
    Wagener KC; Hansen M; Ludvigsen C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Apr; 19(4):348-70. PubMed ID: 18795473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Acoustic Environments in Which Older Adults Wear Their Hearing Aids: Insights From Datalogging Sound Environment Classification.
    Humes LE; Rogers SE; Main AK; Kinney DL
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):594-603. PubMed ID: 30267099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.