BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29848305)

  • 1. Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.
    James P; Hegagi M; Hegagi M; Antonova L; Rostom A; Dube C; Murthy S; Goel R; Chatterjee A
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors.
    Waldmann E; Penz D; Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Rinner C; Jiricka L; Majcher B; Hinterberger A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gut; 2021 Jul; 70(7):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 33023903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
    Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
    Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adenoma detection rate influences the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in low-risk patients.
    Kim TJ; Kim ER; Hong SN; Kim YH; Baek SY; Ahn S; Chang DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):809-817.e1. PubMed ID: 28987544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
    Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
    Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? Results of a modeling study.
    Saini SD; Schoenfeld P; Vijan S
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(7):1856-62. PubMed ID: 23456494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.