194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29850004)
21. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper extremity function and activities of daily living in hemiplegic patients: A single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
Lee MJ; Lee JH; Lee SM
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):659-666. PubMed ID: 30124459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke.
Veerbeek JM; Langbroek-Amersfoort AC; van Wegen EE; Meskers CG; Kwakkel G
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2017 Feb; 31(2):107-121. PubMed ID: 27597165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients.
Franceschini M; Goffredo M; Pournajaf S; Paravati S; Agosti M; De Pisi F; Galafate D; Posteraro F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193235. PubMed ID: 29466440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design of a clinically relevant upper-limb exoskeleton robot for stroke patients with spasticity.
Lee DJ; Bae SJ; Jang SH; Chang PH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():622-627. PubMed ID: 28813889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adaptive control based on an on-line parameter estimation of an upper limb exoskeleton.
Riani A; Madani T; Hadri AE; Benallegue A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():695-701. PubMed ID: 28813901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Design and kinematic analysis of a novel upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Zeiaee A; Soltani-Zarrin R; Langari R; Tafreshi R
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():759-764. PubMed ID: 28813911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Design of a rotational hydroelastic actuator for a powered exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation.
Stienenw AH; Hekman EE; ter Braak H; Aalsma AM; van der Helm FC; van der Kooij H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 19362903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of a Planar Haptic Robot With Minimized Impedance.
Oh K; Rymer WZ; Plenzio I; Mussa-Ivaldi FA; Park S; Choi J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 May; 68(5):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 33206599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?
Duret C; Pila O; Grosmaire AG; Koeppel T
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2019; 37(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 30909254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modulation of shoulder muscle and joint function using a powered upper-limb exoskeleton.
Wu W; Fong J; Crocher V; Lee PVS; Oetomo D; Tan Y; Ackland DC
J Biomech; 2018 Apr; 72():7-16. PubMed ID: 29506759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Series elastic actuation of an elbow rehabilitation exoskeleton with axis misalignment adaptation.
Wu KY; Su YY; Yu YL; Lin KY; Lan CC
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():567-572. PubMed ID: 28813880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shoulder mechanism design of an exoskeleton robot for stroke patient rehabilitation.
Koo D; Chang PH; Sohn MK; Shin JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975505. PubMed ID: 22275701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robot-Assisted Reach Training for Improving Upper Extremity Function of Chronic Stroke.
Cho KH; Song WK
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2015 Oct; 237(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 26460793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym.
Bustamante Valles K; Montes S; Madrigal Mde J; Burciaga A; Martínez ME; Johnson MJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):83. PubMed ID: 27634471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preliminary research of a novel center-driven robot for upper extremity rehabilitation.
Cao W; Zhang F; Yu H; Hu B; Meng Q
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(3):409-420. PubMed ID: 29400683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Upper-Limb Rehabilitation of Patients with Neuromotor Deficits Using Impedance-Based Control of a 6-DOF Robot.
Behidj A; Achiche S; Mohebbi A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Novel adaptive impedance control for exoskeleton robot for rehabilitation using a nonlinear time-delay disturbance observer.
Brahmi B; Driscoll M; El Bojairami IK; Saad M; Brahmi A
ISA Trans; 2021 Feb; 108():381-392. PubMed ID: 32888727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study.
Gilliaux M; Lejeune T; Detrembleur C; Sapin J; Dehez B; Stoquart G
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Mar; 44(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22367455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robustness and Tracking Performance Evaluation of PID Motion Control of 7 DoF Anthropomorphic Exoskeleton Robot Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Ahmed T; Islam MR; Brahmi B; Rahman MH
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
