These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29850584)

  • 21. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.
    Tanaka JL; Ono E; Filho Medici E; Cesar de Moraes L; Cezar de Melo Castilho J; Leonelli de Moraes ME
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17190230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 3189246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lateral Cephalometric Study in Adult Bulgarians with Normal Occlusion.
    Todorova-Plachiyska KG; Stoilova-Todorova MG
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2018 Mar; 60(1):141-146. PubMed ID: 29668455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications.
    Bishara SE; Fahl JA; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 84(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 6576637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 10842115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].
    Liu DX; Zhang L; Wang CL; Zhang XY; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 16999351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of orthodontic treatment with premolar extractions on occlusal planes: A retrospective study.
    Zhu Y; Xiong X; Yang W; Wu Y; Liu J; Ye C; Zhang Q; Han SLR; Wang J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):356-363. PubMed ID: 36300831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A cephalometric study on Twin-block appliance for treatment of early skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Liu Y; Liu YH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):569-72. PubMed ID: 16400480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cephalometric analysis of adults with Turner syndrome.
    Svanberg C; Norevall LI; Ekman B; Wahlberg J; Bågesund M
    Swed Dent J; 2016; 40(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 27464380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of different cephalometric analyses in the diagnosis of class III malocclusion in Saudi and Yemeni population.
    Alassiry AM
    J Orthod Sci; 2020; 9():14. PubMed ID: 33354540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical headgear treatment and growth patterns: analysis by lateral cephalometry.
    Godt A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy.
    Almaqrami BS; Alhammadi MS; Cao B
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Apr; 10(4):e352-e360. PubMed ID: 29750096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
    So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Geometric influence of the sagittal and vertical apical base relationship on the ANB angle.
    Sadat-Khonsari R; Dathe H; Knösel M; Hahn W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Bauss O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Mar; 70(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19322533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sagittal Jaw Relationship of Different Types of Cleft and Non-cleft Individuals.
    Alam MK; Alfawzan AA; Haque S; Mok PL; Marya A; Venugopal A; Jamayet NB; Siddiqui AA
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():651951. PubMed ID: 34026687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.