169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29851392)
1. Optimization of ozonation and peroxone process for simultaneous control of micropollutants and bromate in wastewater.
Phattarapattamawong S; Kaiser AM; Saracevic E; Schaar HP; Krampe J
Water Sci Technol; 2018 May; 2017(2):404-411. PubMed ID: 29851392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pilot-scale evaluation of micropollutant abatements by conventional ozonation, UV/O
Yao W; Ur Rehman SW; Wang H; Yang H; Yu G; Wang Y
Water Res; 2018 Jul; 138():106-117. PubMed ID: 29574198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of micropollutant elimination during ozonation of a hospital wastewater effluent.
Lee Y; Kovalova L; McArdell CS; von Gunten U
Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():134-148. PubMed ID: 25046377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methylisoborneol and geosmin abatement in surface water by conventional ozonation and an electro-peroxone process.
Yao W; Qu Q; von Gunten U; Chen C; Yu G; Wang Y
Water Res; 2017 Jan; 108():373-382. PubMed ID: 27839831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of operational and water quality parameters on conventional ozonation and the advanced oxidation process O
Bourgin M; Borowska E; Helbing J; Hollender J; Kaiser HP; Kienle C; McArdell CS; Simon E; von Gunten U
Water Res; 2017 Oct; 122():234-245. PubMed ID: 28601791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of conventional ozonation and electro-peroxone pretreatment of surface water on disinfection by-product formation during subsequent chlorination.
Mao Y; Guo D; Yao W; Wang X; Yang H; Xie YF; Komarneni S; Yu G; Wang Y
Water Res; 2018 Mar; 130():322-332. PubMed ID: 29247948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Organic Contaminant Abatement in Reclaimed Water by UV/H2O2 and a Combined Process Consisting of O3/H2O2 Followed by UV/H2O2: Prediction of Abatement Efficiency, Energy Consumption, and Byproduct Formation.
Lee Y; Gerrity D; Lee M; Gamage S; Pisarenko A; Trenholm RA; Canonica S; Snyder SA; von Gunten U
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(7):3809-19. PubMed ID: 26909504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of the Electro-Peroxone Process for Micropollutant Abatement Using Chemical Kinetic Approaches.
Wang H; Su L; Zhu S; Zhu W; Han X; Cheng Y; Yu G; Wang Y
Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 31330777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O
Wang H; Zhan J; Yao W; Wang B; Deng S; Huang J; Yu G; Wang Y
Water Res; 2018 Mar; 130():127-138. PubMed ID: 29216480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of UV absorbance and electron donating capacity to assess degradation of micropollutants and formation of bromate during ozonation of wastewater effluents.
Chon K; Salhi E; von Gunten U
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():388-97. PubMed ID: 26140990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal of pharmaceuticals from secondary effluents by an electro-peroxone process.
Yao W; Wang X; Yang H; Yu G; Deng S; Huang J; Wang B; Wang Y
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():826-835. PubMed ID: 26610192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of bromate depression from H
Yu J; Wang Y; Wang Q; Wang Z; Zhang D; Yang M
Chemosphere; 2020 Aug; 252():126596. PubMed ID: 32240859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinetic assessment and modeling of an ozonation step for full-scale municipal wastewater treatment: micropollutant oxidation, by-product formation and disinfection.
Zimmermann SG; Wittenwiler M; Hollender J; Krauss M; Ort C; Siegrist H; von Gunten U
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):605-17. PubMed ID: 20828780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Options and limitations for bromate control during ozonation of wastewater.
Soltermann F; Abegglen C; Tschui M; Stahel S; von Gunten U
Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():76-85. PubMed ID: 28314210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant upgraded with ozonation and biological post-treatments: Abatement of micropollutants, formation of transformation products and oxidation by-products.
Bourgin M; Beck B; Boehler M; Borowska E; Fleiner J; Salhi E; Teichler R; von Gunten U; Siegrist H; McArdell CS
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():486-498. PubMed ID: 29190578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of ozonation and O
Lee W; Choi S; Kim H; Lee W; Lee M; Son H; Lee C; Cho M; Lee Y
J Hazard Mater; 2023 Jul; 454():131436. PubMed ID: 37146328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The electro-peroxone process for the abatement of emerging contaminants: Mechanisms, recent advances, and prospects.
Wang Y; Yu G; Deng S; Huang J; Wang B
Chemosphere; 2018 Oct; 208():640-654. PubMed ID: 29894965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oxidation of emerging biocides and antibiotics in wastewater by ozonation and the electro-peroxone process.
Wang H; Mustafa M; Yu G; Östman M; Cheng Y; Wang Y; Tysklind M
Chemosphere; 2019 Nov; 235():575-585. PubMed ID: 31276870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the prediction of micropollutant elimination during bromide ion-containing industrial wastewater ozonation using the R
Koo JW; Lee J; Nam SH; Kye H; Kim E; Kim H; Lee Y; Hwang TM
Chemosphere; 2023 Oct; 338():139450. PubMed ID: 37451645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Control of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) by ozonation and peroxone process: Role of chloride on removal of DBP precursors.
Deeudomwongsa P; Phattarapattamawong S; Andrew Lin KY
Chemosphere; 2017 Oct; 184():1215-1222. PubMed ID: 28672704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
