196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29853095)
1. Osseodensification outperforms conventional implant subtractive instrumentation: A study in sheep.
Oliveira PGFP; Bergamo ETP; Neiva R; Bonfante EA; Witek L; Tovar N; Coelho PG
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():300-307. PubMed ID: 29853095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep.
Lahens B; Neiva R; Tovar N; Alifarag AM; Jimbo R; Bonfante EA; Bowers MM; Cuppini M; Freitas H; Witek L; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():56-65. PubMed ID: 27341291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseodensification Versus Subtractive Drilling Techniques in Bone Healing and Implant Osseointegration: Ex Vivo Histomorphologic/Histomorphometric Analysis in a Low-Density Bone Ovine Model.
Mullings O; Tovar N; Abreu de Bortoli JP; Parra M; Torroni A; Coelho PG; Witek L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):903-909. PubMed ID: 34698715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation Between Implant Geometry, Implant Surface, Insertion Torque, and Primary Stability: In Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.
Falco A; Berardini M; Trisi P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):824-830. PubMed ID: 30024998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Osseodensification enables bone healing chambers with improved low-density bone site primary stability: an in vivo study.
Mello-Machado RC; Sartoretto SC; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia JA; de Uzeda MJPG; Mourão CFAB; Ghiraldini B; Bezerra FJB; Senna PM; Calasans-Maia MD
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15436. PubMed ID: 34326400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of a modified cutting flute implant design on osseointegration.
Jimbo R; Tovar N; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Anchieta RB; Silveira LM; Janal MN; Shibli JA; Coelho PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 43(7):883-8. PubMed ID: 24583140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible.
Trisi P; Todisco M; Consolo U; Travaglini D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):837-49. PubMed ID: 21841994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Implant Thread Geometry on Secondary Stability, Bone Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact: A Biomechanical and Histological Analysis.
Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
Implant Dent; 2015 Aug; 24(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 25939083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atemporal osseointegration: Early biomechanical stability through osseodensification.
Alifarag AM; Lopez CD; Neiva RF; Tovar N; Witek L; Coelho PG
J Orthop Res; 2018 Sep; 36(9):2516-2523. PubMed ID: 29537128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analysis of endosteal implants placed by using the osseodensification technique in animal models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gaikwad AM; Joshi AA; Nadgere JB
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 33139057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nontraumatic Implant Explantation: A Biomechanical and Biological Analysis in Sheep Tibia.
Anitua E; Murias-Freijo A; Piñas L; Tejero R; Prado R; Orive G
J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 25536339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can Osseointegration Be Achieved Without Primary Stability?
Al-Sabbagh M; Eldomiaty W; Khabbaz Y
Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):461-473. PubMed ID: 31097138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Tapered and Nontapered Implants in the Minipig.
Cochran D; Stavropoulos A; Obrecht M; Pippenger B; Dard M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1341-1347. PubMed ID: 27861658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device.
Menicucci G; Pachie E; Lorenzetti M; Migliaretti G; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 22930768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration.
Ogle OE
Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):505-20. PubMed ID: 25835806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implants with different surface treatments: A study in sheep.
Lahens B; Lopez CD; Neiva RF; Bowers MM; Jimbo R; Bonfante EA; Morcos J; Witek L; Tovar N; Coelho PG
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Apr; 107(3):615-623. PubMed ID: 30080320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of intraoperative bone quality testing on bone healing and osseointegration of dental implants.
Karl M; Palarie V; Nacu V; Krafft T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1254-60. PubMed ID: 24066315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone of immediate or delayed occlusal-loaded non-splinted implants in the posterior mandible--an experimental study in monkeys.
Stokholm R; Isidor F; Nyengaard JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 24118392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
