These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

591 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29853222)

  • 1. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
    Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
    Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance and Reading Time of Automated Breast US with or without Computer-aided Detection.
    Yang S; Gao X; Liu L; Shu R; Yan J; Zhang G; Xiao Y; Ju Y; Zhao N; Song H
    Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):540-549. PubMed ID: 31210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification of breast cancer in ultrasound imaging using a generic deep learning analysis software: a pilot study.
    Becker AS; Mueller M; Stoffel E; Marcon M; Ghafoor S; Boss A
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1083):20170576. PubMed ID: 29215311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
    Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
    van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic Breast Volume Scanner versus Handheld Ultrasound in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Wang L; Qi ZH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 31130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A signal-detection experiment measuring the effect of computer-aided detection on radiologists' performance.
    Ikeda M; Shigaki T; Yamauchi K
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 10929857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the effect of computer-aided classification of benign and malignant lesions on reader performance in automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.
    Tan T; Platel B; Twellmann T; van Schie G; Mus R; Grivegnée A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1381-8. PubMed ID: 24119350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of combined use of automated breast volume scanning & hand-held ultrasound for breast lesions.
    Liu J; Zhou Y; Wu J; Li P; Liang X; Duan H; Wu X; Hou X; Li X
    Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):347-354. PubMed ID: 35295015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
    Jiang Y; Inciardi MF; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):452-461. PubMed ID: 29792747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of automated breast volume scanner combined with virtual touch tissue quantification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: A comparative study with mammography.
    Wang J; Fan H; Zhu Y; Shen C; Qiang B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(16):e25568. PubMed ID: 33879713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
    Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-Dimensional Assessment of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Compared with Handheld Ultrasound in Pre-Operative Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinomas: A Pilot Study of 51 Cases.
    Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Yang B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 27339762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Linda A; Lorenzon M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1000-1008. PubMed ID: 29018952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.