These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29853243)

  • 1. Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers.
    Manzon L; Fratto G; Rossi E; Buccheri A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jun; 153(6):852-860. PubMed ID: 29853243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech.
    Atik E; Esen Aydinli F; Kulak Kayikçi ME; Ciger S
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):440-445. PubMed ID: 27507127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers.
    Eroglu AK; Baka ZM; Arslan U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of different orthodontic retention protocols on the periodontal health of mandibular incisors.
    Rody WJ; Elmaraghy S; McNeight AM; Chamberlain CA; Antal D; Dolce C; Wheeler TT; McGorray SP; Shaddox LM
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2016 Nov; 19(4):198-208. PubMed ID: 27647720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Periodontal implications of bonded versus removable retainers.
    Heier EE; De Smit AA; Wijgaerts IA; Adriaens PA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 9423692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period.
    Vagdouti G; Karvouni E; Bitsanis E; Koletsi D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periodontal effects and survival rates of different mandibular retainers: comparison of bonding technique and wire thickness.
    Gökçe B; Kaya B
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 Nov; 41(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 31365926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study.
    Kumar AG; Bansal A
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21696115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a prospective study of two types of lower fixed retainers.
    Al-Nimri K; Al Habashneh R; Obeidat M
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20043549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 2: periodontal health outcomes after 12 months.
    Storey M; Forde K; Littlewood SJ; Scott P; Luther F; Kang J
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 29059293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.
    Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Farshidnia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):443-449. PubMed ID: 29728551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers.
    Demir A; Babacan H; Nalcacı R; Topcuoglu T
    Korean J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 42(5):255-62. PubMed ID: 23173119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The association of orthodontic treatment and fixed retainers with gingival health.
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR; Machtei EE
    J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 18980517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term follow-up of maxillary fixed retention: survival rate and periodontal health.
    Dietrich P; Patcas R; Pandis N; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 25086911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers.
    Chagas AS; Freitas KMS; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; Canuto LFG; Oliveira RCG; Oliveira RCG
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 31335161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-up.
    Kara B; Yilmaz B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32241360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: An in-vivo study.
    Raghavan AS; Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):471-476. PubMed ID: 28257731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of fixed vs removable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Moghrabi D; Johal A; O'Rourke N; Donos N; Pandis N; Gonzales-Marin C; Fleming PS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Aug; 154(2):167-174.e1. PubMed ID: 30075919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase.
    Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Lindstrom AF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21803257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.