These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29853301)
21. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E Ann Oncol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 14998847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biopsy rate and positive predictive value for breast cancer in BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions. Wiratkapun C; Bunyapaiboonsri W; Wibulpolprasert B; Lertsithichai P J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Jul; 93(7):830-7. PubMed ID: 20649064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors. Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions. Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Unveiling the potential of breast MRI: a game changer for BI-RADS 4A microcalcifications. Li S; Lin Y; Liu G; Shao Z; Yang Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2024 Jul; 206(2):425-435. PubMed ID: 38664289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of malignant risk stratification for microcalcifications interpreted as "amorphous" morphology on mammography: A study based on the 5th edition of breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Kim D; Kim J; Jung HK; Kim S Eur J Radiol; 2023 May; 162():110795. PubMed ID: 36996721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China. Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Mahoney MC; Gatsonis C; Hanna L; DeMartini WB; Lehman C Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 22589320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is a one-year follow-up an efficient method for better management of MRI BI-RADS(®) 3 lesions? Boisserie-Lacroix M; Ziadé C; Hurtevent-Labrot G; Ferron S; Brouste V; Lippa N Breast; 2016 Jun; 27():1-7. PubMed ID: 27212693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes. Benndorf M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 20707656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of the probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) assessment for masses on breast MRI: Is it transferable to general clinical practice? Price ER; Sickles EA; Yitta S; Brasic N; Yeh MJ; Allen IE; Joe BN Breast J; 2018 Mar; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 28845605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience. Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast as a problem-solving method: to be or not to be? Oztekin PS; Kosar PN Breast J; 2014; 20(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 25200378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications? Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation. Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI. Strigel RM; Burnside ES; Elezaby M; Fowler AM; Kelcz F; Salkowski LR; DeMartini WB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1392-1399. PubMed ID: 28792802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]