These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29853311)
1. Electrical stimulation of the midbrain excites the auditory cortex asymmetrically. Quass GL; Kurt S; Hildebrandt KJ; Kral A Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1161-1174. PubMed ID: 29853311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intralaminar stimulation of the inferior colliculus facilitates frequency-specific activation in the auditory cortex. Allitt BJ; Benjaminsen C; Morgan SJ; Paolini AG J Neural Eng; 2013 Aug; 10(4):046008. PubMed ID: 23800787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant. Lim HH; Anderson DJ J Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 96(3):975-88. PubMed ID: 16723413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Inferior Colliculus on Frequency Discrimination by Rhesus Monkeys and Implications for the Auditory Midbrain Implant. Pages DS; Ross DA; Puñal VM; Agashe S; Dweck I; Mueller J; Grill WM; Wilson BS; Groh JM J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(18):5071-83. PubMed ID: 27147659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of location and timing of co-activated neurons in the auditory midbrain on cortical activity: implications for a new central auditory prosthesis. Straka MM; McMahon M; Markovitz CD; Lim HH J Neural Eng; 2014 Aug; 11(4):046021. PubMed ID: 25003629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midbrain responses to micro-stimulation of the cochlea using high density thin-film arrays. Allitt BJ; Morgan SJ; Bell S; Nayagam DA; Arhatari B; Clark GM; Paolini AG Hear Res; 2012 May; 287(1-2):30-42. PubMed ID: 22531007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological validation of a human prototype auditory midbrain implant in a guinea pig model. Lenarz M; Lim HH; Patrick JF; Anderson DJ; Lenarz T J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 7(4):383-98. PubMed ID: 17075701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception. Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex. Middlebrooks JC J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant. Lim HH; Anderson DJ J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 27(32):8733-43. PubMed ID: 17687050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Large-scale reorganization of the tonotopic map in mouse auditory midbrain revealed by MRI. Yu X; Sanes DH; Aristizabal O; Wadghiri YZ; Turnbull DH Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(29):12193-8. PubMed ID: 17620614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]