182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29854137)
21. Mobile Health Apps for Medical Emergencies: Systematic Review.
Plaza Roncero A; Marques G; Sainz-De-Abajo B; Martín-Rodríguez F; Del Pozo Vegas C; Garcia-Zapirain B; de la Torre-Díez I
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e18513. PubMed ID: 33306037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.
Joo E; Kononova A; Kanthawala S; Peng W; Cotten S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Apr; 9(4):e16518. PubMed ID: 33847596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).
Knitza J; Tascilar K; Messner EM; Meyer M; Vossen D; Pulla A; Bosch P; Kittler J; Kleyer A; Sewerin P; Mucke J; Haase I; Simon D; Krusche M
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Aug; 7(8):e14991. PubMed ID: 31381501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of free mobile health applications for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.
Karsalia M; Malik R
Am J Surg; 2022 Jan; 223(1):187-193. PubMed ID: 34391568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Quality of Indian Obesity-Related mHealth Apps: PRECEDE-PROCEED Model-Based Content Analysis.
Selvaraj SN; Sriram A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 May; 10(5):e15719. PubMed ID: 35544318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Persian mHealth Apps: A Cross Sectional Study Based on Use Case Classification.
Saeedi MG; Kalhori SR; Nouri R; Yasini M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():230-4. PubMed ID: 27577377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Menstrual Tracking Mobile App Review by Consumers and Health Care Providers: Quality Evaluations Study.
Ko S; Lee J; An D; Woo H
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Mar; 11():e40921. PubMed ID: 36857125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Server-Focused Security Assessment of Mobile Health Apps for Popular Mobile Platforms.
Müthing J; Brüngel R; Friedrich CM
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e9818. PubMed ID: 30672738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Longitudinal trends in the quality, effectiveness and attributes of highly rated smartphone health apps.
Mercurio M; Larsen M; Wisniewski H; Henson P; Lagan S; Torous J
Evid Based Ment Health; 2020 Aug; 23(3):107-111. PubMed ID: 32312794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing the Quality of Mobile Health-Related Apps: Interrater Reliability Study of Two Guides.
Miró J; Llorens-Vernet P
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Apr; 9(4):e26471. PubMed ID: 33871376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.
Grundy Q; Chiu K; Held F; Continella A; Bero L; Holz R
BMJ; 2019 Mar; 364():l920. PubMed ID: 30894349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. User Control of Personal mHealth Data Using a Mobile Blockchain App: Design Science Perspective.
Sengupta A; Subramanian H
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jan; 10(1):e32104. PubMed ID: 35049504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation.
Voth M; Chisholm S; Sollid H; Jones C; Smith-MacDonald L; Brémault-Phillips S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jan; 10(1):e26453. PubMed ID: 35044307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.
Lau N; O'Daffer A; Yi-Frazier JP; Rosenberg AR
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jul; 9(7):e29689. PubMed ID: 34259639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Data Collection Mechanisms in Health and Wellness Apps: Review and Analysis.
Philip BJ; Abdelrazek M; Bonti A; Barnett S; Grundy J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Mar; 10(3):e30468. PubMed ID: 35262499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mobile Apps in Oncology: A Survey on Health Care Professionals' Attitude Toward Telemedicine, mHealth, and Oncological Apps.
Kessel KA; Vogel MME; Schmidt-Graf F; Combs SE
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Nov; 18(11):e312. PubMed ID: 27884810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mobile PHRs compliance with Android and iOS usability guidelines.
Cruz Zapata B; Hernández Niñirola A; Idri A; Fernández-Alemán JL; Toval A
J Med Syst; 2014 Aug; 38(8):81. PubMed ID: 24957397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Critical Criteria and Countermeasures for Mobile Health Developers to Ensure Mobile Health Privacy and Security: Mixed Methods Study.
Rezaee R; Khashayar M; Saeedinezhad S; Nasiri M; Zare S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Mar; 11():e39055. PubMed ID: 36862494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older.
Arnhold M; Quade M; Kirch W
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Apr; 16(4):e104. PubMed ID: 24718852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Popular apps on the medical category targeting patients and the general public in the United Kingdom: Do they conform to the Health On the Net Foundation principles?
Ben-Mussa A; Paget AM
Health Informatics J; 2018 Sep; 24(3):259-276. PubMed ID: 27566750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
