These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29854168)

  • 1. User Requirements for an Electronic Medical Records System for Oncology in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Uganda.
    Kabukye JK; Koch S; Cornet R; Orem J; Hagglund M
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1004-1013. PubMed ID: 29854168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elicitation and prioritization of requirements for electronic health records for oncology in low resource settings: A concept mapping study.
    Kabukye JK; de Keizer N; Cornet R
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 135():104055. PubMed ID: 31877404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case study of an EMR system at a large hospital in India: challenges and strategies for successful adoption.
    Scholl J; Syed-Abdul S; Ahmed LA
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):958-67. PubMed ID: 21846508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinicians' Role in the Adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App in Europe and Its Implications for Organizational Practices: Qualitative Case Study.
    Jacob C; Sanchez-Vazquez A; Ivory C
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 May; 7(5):e13555. PubMed ID: 31066710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.
    Top M; Gider O
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1979-88. PubMed ID: 21302133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators.
    Embi PJ; Weir C; Efthimiadis EN; Thielke SM; Hedeen AN; Hammond KW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013; 20(4):718-26. PubMed ID: 23355462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the focus group: understanding physicians' barriers to electronic medical records.
    Yan H; Gardner R; Baier R
    Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2012 Apr; 38(4):184-91. PubMed ID: 22533131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
    Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
    J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic Medical Records adoption challenges in Mexico.
    Gómez Reynoso JM; Tulu B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():1093. PubMed ID: 18694190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types.
    Miller RH; Sim I; Newman J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):658-62. PubMed ID: 15360895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling antecedents of electronic medical record system implementation success in low-resource setting hospitals.
    Tilahun B; Fritz F
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Aug; 15():61. PubMed ID: 26231051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the electronic medical record (EMR) in care delivery development in developing countries: a systematic review.
    Williams F; Boren SA
    Inform Prim Care; 2008; 16(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 18713530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.
    Farzandipour M; Meidani Z; Riazi H; Sadeqi Jabali M
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2018 Sep; 43(3):280-299. PubMed ID: 28398097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinician's assessments of outpatient electronic medical record alert and reminder usability and usefulness requirements.
    Krall MA; Sittig DF
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2002; ():400-4. PubMed ID: 12463855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital.
    Kim S; Lee KH; Hwang H; Yoo S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():12. PubMed ID: 26831123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of functional requirements for electronic health communication: preliminary results from the ELIN project.
    Christensen T; Grimsmo A
    Inform Prim Care; 2005; 13(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 16259860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Experience of Electronic Health Records Implementation in a Mexican Region.
    Uc BM; Castillo-Sánchez G; Marques G; Arambarri J; de la Torre-Díez I
    J Med Syst; 2020 Apr; 44(6):106. PubMed ID: 32323000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing diffusion of electronic medical records: a case study in three healthcare institutions in Japan.
    Ochieng OG; Hosoi R
    Health Inf Manag; 2006; 34(4):120-9. PubMed ID: 18216416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.