These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29854176)

  • 1. A Framework for Data Quality Assessment in Clinical Research Datasets.
    Lee K; Weiskopf N; Pathak J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1080-1089. PubMed ID: 29854176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment.
    Ozonze O; Scott PJ; Hopgood AA
    J Med Syst; 2023 Feb; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 36781551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of openEHR archetypes to automate data quality rules for electronic health records: a case study.
    Tian Q; Han Z; Yu P; An J; Lu X; Duan H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Apr; 21(1):113. PubMed ID: 33812388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying Data Quality Dimensions for Person-Generated Wearable Device Data: Multi-Method Study.
    Cho S; Weng C; Kahn MG; Natarajan K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Dec; 9(12):e31618. PubMed ID: 34941540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.
    Kahn MG; Callahan TJ; Barnard J; Bauck AE; Brown J; Davidson BN; Estiri H; Goerg C; Holve E; Johnson SG; Liaw ST; Hamilton-Lopez M; Meeker D; Ong TC; Ryan P; Shang N; Weiskopf NG; Weng C; Zozus MN; Schilling L
    EGEMS (Wash DC); 2016; 4(1):1244. PubMed ID: 27713905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges in data quality: the influence of data quality assessments on data availability and completeness in a voluntary medical male circumcision programme in Zimbabwe.
    Xiao Y; Bochner AF; Makunike B; Holec M; Xaba S; Tshimanga M; Chitimbire V; Barnhart S; Feldacker C
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013562. PubMed ID: 28132009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linking a Consortium-Wide Data Quality Assessment Tool with the MIRACUM Metadata Repository.
    Kapsner LA; Mang JM; Mate S; Seuchter SA; Vengadeswaran A; Bathelt F; Deppenwiese N; Kadioglu D; Kraska D; Prokosch HU
    Appl Clin Inform; 2021 Aug; 12(4):826-835. PubMed ID: 34433217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.
    Lewis AE; Weiskopf N; Abrams ZB; Foraker R; Lai AM; Payne PRO; Gupta A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2023 Sep; 30(10):1730-1740. PubMed ID: 37390812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collaborative data familiarisation and quality assessment: Reflections from use of a national dataset to investigate palliative care for Indigenous Australians.
    Woods JA; Johnson CE; Allingham SF; Ngo HT; Katzenellenbogen JM; Thompson SC
    Health Inf Manag; 2021; 50(1-2):64-75. PubMed ID: 32216561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Data Quality Assessment Checks in Six Data Sharing Networks.
    Callahan TJ; Bauck AE; Bertoch D; Brown J; Khare R; Ryan PB; Staab J; Zozus MN; Kahn MG
    EGEMS (Wash DC); 2017 Jun; 5(1):8. PubMed ID: 29881733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moving Towards an EHR Data Quality Framework: The MIRACUM Approach.
    Kapsner LA; Kampf MO; Seuchter SA; Kamdje-Wabo G; Gradinger T; Ganslandt T; Mate S; Gruendner J; Kraska D; Prokosch HU
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Sep; 267():247-253. PubMed ID: 31483279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of a Data Quality Framework to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Electronic Health Record Data From the
    Berman L; Ostchega Y; Giannini J; Anandan LP; Clark E; Spotnitz M; Sulieman L; Volynski M; Ramirez A
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2024 Aug; 8():e2400052. PubMed ID: 39178364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representing Rules for Clinical Data Quality Assessment Based on OpenEHR Guideline Definition Language.
    Tian Q; Han Z; An J; Lu X; Duan H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1606-1607. PubMed ID: 31438254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Completeness, accuracy, and computability of National Quality Forum-specified eMeasures.
    Amster A; Jentzsch J; Pasupuleti H; Subramanian KG
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 25326598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience.
    Daniel C; Serre P; Orlova N; Bréant S; Paris N; Griffon N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Nov; 181():104804. PubMed ID: 30497872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing defects in the datasets of clinical research studies: conformance with data quality metrics.
    Shaheen NA; Manezhi B; Thomas A; AlKelya M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31077148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring completeness in clinical data research networks with DQe-c.
    Estiri H; Stephens KA; Klann JG; Murphy SN
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Jan; 25(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 29069394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of data quality in a multi-site electronic medical record system in Haiti.
    Puttkammer N; Baseman JG; Devine EB; Valles JS; Hyppolite N; Garilus F; Honoré JG; Matheson AI; Zeliadt S; Yuhas K; Sherr K; Cadet JR; Zamor G; Pierre E; Barnhart S
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Feb; 86():104-16. PubMed ID: 26620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data Quality in Electronic Health Records Research: Quality Domains and Assessment Methods.
    Feder SL
    West J Nurs Res; 2018 May; 40(5):753-766. PubMed ID: 28322657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metadata requirements for portals.
    Benson T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():577-81. PubMed ID: 25991214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.