These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29854881)

  • 1. Comparison of Dental Panoramic Radiography and CBCT for Measuring Vertical Bone Height in Different Horizontal Locations of Posterior Mandibular Alveolar Process.
    Shahidi S; Zamiri B; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Paknahad M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2018 Jun; 19(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 29854881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of location of alveolar crest on the vertical bone heights on panoramic radiographs.
    Lee SM; Lee SS; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Feb; 41(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 22116134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.
    Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K
    Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reliability of surgeons to avoid traumatic insertion of dental implants into high-risk regions: a panoramic radiograph study.
    Jamil FA; Mohammed JA; Hasan TA; Rzoqi MG
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32252728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study.
    Özalp Ö; Tezerişener HA; Kocabalkan B; Büyükkaplan UŞ; Özarslan MM; Şimşek Kaya G; Altay MA; Sindel A
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Dec; 48(4):269-275. PubMed ID: 30607351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A; Pai KM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Localization of mandibular canal and assessment of the remaining alveolar bone in posterior segment of the mandible with single missing tooth using cone-beam computed tomography: a cross sectional comparative study.
    Alrahaimi SF; Venkatesh E
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 43(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 28462194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informational content of two-dimensional panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs with respect to the bone volume of intraoral donor regions considering CBCT imaging.
    Brockmeyer P; Wiechens B; Sevinc T; Schliephake H; Hahn W
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):318. PubMed ID: 35907826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone.
    Çiftçi ME; Aktan AM; İşman Ö; Yıldırım E
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr; 38(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26370261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.
    Winstanley KL; Otway LM; Thompson L; Brook ZH; King N; Koong B; O'Halloran M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12323. PubMed ID: 29399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mylohyoid Ridge as a Predictor of Available Bone for Implant Placement: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Retrospective Observational Study.
    Madhok S; Kiruthika S; Prabhu K; Abraham S; Kabilan P; Nithyapriya S
    Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27470. PubMed ID: 36060375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
    Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparison of roof visibility of the mandibular canal between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness of the mandible.
    Ketabi AR; Zelka A; Lauer HC; Hassfeld S
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 May; 7(1):39. PubMed ID: 34002304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of Location of the Mandibular Canal: Correlation Between Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Measurements.
    Bertram F; Bertram S; Rudisch A; Emshoff R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):129–134. PubMed ID: 29448262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal.
    Shahidi S; Zamiri B; Bronoosh P
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Jun; 43(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 23807934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal.
    Jung YH; Cho BH
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Dec; 44(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 25473634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.