These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29855099)

  • 1. Sparse periodicity-based auditory features explain human performance in a spatial multitalker auditory scene analysis task.
    Josupeit A; Schoenmaker E; van de Par S; Hohmann V
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1353-1363. PubMed ID: 29855099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectro-temporal modulation glimpsing for speech intelligibility prediction.
    Edraki A; Chan WY; Jensen J; Fogerty D
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108620. PubMed ID: 36175300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intelligibility for Binaural Speech with Discarded Low-SNR Speech Components.
    Schoenmaker E; van de Par S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():73-81. PubMed ID: 27080648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better-ear glimpsing efficiency with symmetrically-placed interfering talkers.
    Brungart DS; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2545-56. PubMed ID: 23039448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility in virtual restaurants.
    Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2418. PubMed ID: 27794329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Segregation of Concurrent Speech: Effects of Background Noise and Reverberation on Auditory Scene Analysis in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.
    Sayles M; Stasiak A; Winter IM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():389-397. PubMed ID: 27080680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulation masking and fine structure shape neural envelope coding to predict speech intelligibility across diverse listening conditions.
    Viswanathan V; Bharadwaj HM; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Heinz MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):2230. PubMed ID: 34598642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E; Brand T; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of better-ear glimpsing on spatial release from masking.
    Glyde H; Buchholz J; Dillon H; Best V; Hickson L; Cameron S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2937-45. PubMed ID: 24116429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
    Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.